Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25648299›Full record

Trial reportCancer biology & therapy2015

A phase II trial of biweekly vinorelbine and oxaliplatin in second- or third-line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Jian Zhang, Leiping Wang, Zhonghua Wang, Xichun Hu, Biyun Wang, Jun Cao, Fangfang Lv, Chunlei Zhen, Sheng Zhang, Zhimin Shao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer biology & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01528826 (A Prospective Phase II Trial of Vinorelbine Plus Oxaliplatin in Pretreated Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01528826 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective Phase II Trial of Vinorelbine Plus Oxaliplatin in Pretreated Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled35ConditionsBreast CancerArmsvinorelbine plus oxaliplatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jian Zhanga Department of Medical Oncology ; Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University ; Shanghai , China.
Leiping Wang
Zhonghua Wang
Xichun Hu
Biyun Wang
Jun Cao
Fangfang Lv
Chunlei Zhen
Sheng Zhang
Zhimin Shao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) typically have a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly combination of vinorelbine and oxaliplatin (NVBOX) in second- or third-line setting for mTNBC. Eligible patients were female with 18-70 y old, and had mTNBC that had progressed after 1or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. NVBOX was given biweekly every 4 week for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Forty-4 patients were recruited. All patients had been exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes; 56.8% of patients were cis/carbo-platin pretreated. Among the 38 evaluable patients, overall response rate was 31.6% and 7 lasted ≥ 6 months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.3 (95% CI, 3.6-5.0) months and 12.6 (95% CI, 8.1-17.0) months, respectively. PFS and OS was significantly shorter in patients with interval from diagnosis to recurrence ≤ 1 y and time to progression (TTP) of 1-2 previous regimens before recruitment ≤ 3 months. For 34 patients who were treated in second line setting, prior platinum was a factor significantly compromising the PFS of NVBOX. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (70.5%), thrombocytopenia (27.3%) and anemia (15.9%). The most frequent grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were constipation/abdominal distension (20.5%) and nausea/vomiting (13.6%). We conclude that biweekly NVBOX regimen is effective with a good safety profile in the second- or third-line mTNBC, which warrants further investigation in a phase III study. This trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT01528826).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinVinblastineVinorelbineAE, adverse eventsANC, absolute neutrophil countCBR, rate of clinical benefitchemotherapyCI, confidence intervalCR, complete responseECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupER, estrogen receptorFISH, fluorescence in situ hybridizationHER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2HR, hazard ratioIHC, immunohistochemistryIV, intravenouslyMBC, metastatic breast cancermetastatic breast cancermTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancerORR, overall response rateoxaliplatinPgR, progesterone receptorPR, partial responseSD, stable diseaseTNBC, triple-negative breast cancertriple-negativeTTP, time to progressionULN, upper limit of normalvinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID25648299
PMCPMC4622533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.