Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25648257›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2015

Sexual orientation and smoking history: results from a community-based sample of youth in Shanghai, China.

Qiguo Lian, Xiayun Zuo, Chaohua Lou, Ersheng Gao, Yan Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiguo LianDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Xiayun Zuo
Chaohua Lou
Ersheng Gao
Yan Cheng
Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCigarette smoking has been found to be more prevalent among adults and youths with a minority sexual orientation (lesbian, gay, bisexual, LGB) than among the general population, while less is known about smoking among LGB youth in low- and middle-income countries. The goal of the study was to examine cigarette smoking in relation to sexual orientation in a community-based sample of youth in Shanghai, China.

methodsA multi-center cross-sectional survey of 17,016 youth aged 15-24 years was conducted in rural and urban areas of Hanoi, Vietnam; Taipei, Taiwan; and Shanghai, China in 2006. In this article, analysis was restricted to the 6,299 respondents in Shanghai. Assessments included ever smoking, age at first smoking, frequency of smoking, and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between sexual orientation and cigarette smoking.

resultsNine percent (594/6,299) of eligible participants considered themselves as LGB youths; 34.2% ever smoked, 14.81% initiated smoking before age 13, 15.9% smoked in the past 30 days, and 14.1% were moderate or heavy smokers. LGB identity predicted moderate or heavy smoking (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3, 3.9). Male LGB youth smoked more cigarettes daily (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3, 3.9) whilst female LGB youth reported less any prior cigarette use (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5, 1.0).

conclusionsFew meaningful disparities in cigarette smoking were related to sexual orientation, except male LGB youth consumed more cigarettes daily. Prevention and cessation should target this population, especially male LGB youth.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorAdultChinaFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceResidence CharacteristicsSex FactorsSmokingUrban PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25648257
PMCPMC4434233
OpenAlexW2047858676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.