Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25647753›Full record

Trial reportPsychosomatic medicine

Placebo improvement in pharmacologic treatment of menopausal hot flashes: time course, duration, and predictors.

Ellen W Freeman, Kristine E Ensrud, Joseph C Larson, Katherine A Guthrie, Janet S Carpenter, Hadine Joffe, Katherine M Newton, Barbara Sternfeld, Andrea Z LaCroix

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychosomatic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Placebo treatment facilitates social trust and approach behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Hormonal Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: a Review of Clinical Data.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Lights on MsFLASH: a review of contributions.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  15. Efficacy ofFood & nutrition research · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Placebo Effects in Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of neurotrauma · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellen W FreemanFrom the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Psychiatry (Freeman), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health (Ensrud), Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Health System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Medicine (Ensrud), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; MsFlash Data Coordinating Center (Larson, Guthrie), Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; School of Nursing (Carpenter), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Psychiatry (Joffe), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychosocial (Joffe) Dana Farber Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Group Health Research Institute (Newton), Seattle, Washington; Division of Research (Sternfeld), Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California; Women's Health Center, Family and Preventive Medicine (LaCroix), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kristine E Ensrud
Joseph C Larson
Katherine A Guthrie
Janet S Carpenter
Hadine Joffe
Katherine M Newton
Barbara Sternfeld
Andrea Z LaCroix

Funding

Menopausal Symptoms Initiative-Finding Lasting Answers for Sweats and Hot FlashesU01AG032699 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2008 to 2012
$13.5M
MsFLASH: Living a Healthy MenopauseR01AG048209 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2015 to 2019
$7.2M
MSI-FLASH: Relative Efficacy of Hormonal and Non-Hormonal Interventions for VMSU01AG032700 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COHEN, LEE S, JOFFE, HADINE · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
MSI FLASH: An RCT of Yoga and Ultra Low-Dose Estrogen Gel for Vasomotor SymptomsU01AG032682 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI NEWTON, KATHERINE M. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Efficacy of an SSRI for Menopausal Symptoms in Perimenopausal WomenU01AG032656 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FREEMAN, ELLEN W · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
MSI-FLASH: Paced Respiration for Breast Cancer SurvivorsU01AG032659 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CARPENTER, JANET S · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
MSI-FLASH: An Exercise Intervention for Women with Menopausal SymptomsU01AG032669 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CAAN, BETTE J · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048209NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032656NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032659NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032669NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032682NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032699NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032700NIA NIH HHS UO1AG032656NIA NIH HHS UO1AG032659NIA NIH HHS UO1AG032669NIA NIH HHS UO1AG032682NIA NIH HHS UO1AG032699NIA NIH HHS UO1AG032700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize the time course, duration of improvement, and clinical predictors of placebo response in treatment of menopausal hot flashes.

methodsData were pooled from two trials conducted in the Menopausal Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health network, providing a combined placebo group (n = 247) and a combined active treatment group (n = 297). Participants recorded hot flash frequency in diaries twice daily during treatment (Weeks 0-8) and subsequent follow-up (Weeks 9-11). The primary outcome variable was clinically significant improvement, defined as a 50% or greater decrease in hot flash frequency from baseline and calculated for each week in the study. Subgroups were defined a priori using standard clinical definitions for significant improvement and partial improvement. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were evaluated as predictors of improvement.

resultsClinically significant improvement with placebo accrued each treatment week, with 33% significantly improved at Week 8. Of placebo responders who were improved at both Weeks 4 and 8, 77% remained clinically improved at Week 11 after treatment ended. Independent predictors of significant placebo improvement in the final multivariable model were African American race (odds ratio [OR] = 5.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.41-13.07, p < .001), current smokers (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.05-5.06, p = .038), and hot flash severity in screening (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.00-2.10, p = .047).

conclusionsClinically significant improvement with placebo accrued throughout treatment with a time course similar to improvement with active drug. A meaningful number of participants in the placebo group sustained a clinically significant response after stopping placebo pills. The results suggest that nonspecific effects are important components of treatment and warrant further studies to optimize their contributions in clinical care.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectCitalopramDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEstradiolFemaleHot FlashesHumansMiddle AgedPlacebosSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeCitalopramEstradiolPlacebosSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25647753
PMCPMC4333078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.