Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25647696›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Selection of sucrose concentration depends on the effort required to obtain it: studies using tetrabenazine, D1, D2, and D3 receptor antagonists.

Marta Pardo, Laura López-Cruz, Noemí San Miguel, John D Salamone, Mercè Correa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vigor, Effort-Related Aspects of Motivation and Anhedonia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Novel Atypical Dopamine Uptake InhibitorFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta PardoÀrea de Psicobiologia, Campus de Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castelló, Spain.
Laura López-CruzÀrea de Psicobiologia, Campus de Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castelló, Spain.
Noemí San MiguelÀrea de Psicobiologia, Campus de Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castelló, Spain.
John D SalamoneDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-1020, USA.
Mercè CorreaÀrea de Psicobiologia, Campus de Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castelló, Spain. correa@psb.uji.es.

Funding

Effort-related Functions of Nucleus Accumbens Adenosine A2A ReceptorsR01MH078023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI SALAMONE, JOHN D · 2007 to 2010
$835k
NIMH NIH HHS MH078023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLow doses of dopamine (DA) antagonists and accumbens DA depletions reduce food-reinforced instrumental behavior but do not impair primary food motivation, causing animals to reallocate behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements and select less effortful alternatives. However, it is uncertain if this same pattern of effects would occur if sucrose was used as the reinforcer.

objectivesThese experiments studied the impact of DA depletion and antagonism on performance of an effort-related choice task using sucrose as the reinforcer, as well as sucrose consumption, preference, and taste reactivity tests.

methodsThe effects of DA manipulations were assessed using a task in which rats chose between lever pressing on a fixed ratio 7 schedule for 5.0 % sucrose versus freely consuming a less concentrated solution (0.3 %).

resultsThe DA depleting agent tetrabenazine shifted effort-related choice, decreasing lever pressing for 5.0 % sucrose but increasing intake of the concurrently available 0.3 % sucrose. Tetrabenazine did not affect sucrose appetitive taste reactivity, or sucrose consumption or preference, in free consumption tests. The D1 antagonist ecopipam and the D2 antagonist haloperidol also shifted choice behavior at doses that did not alter sucrose consumption or preference. In contrast, sucrose pre-exposure reduced consumption across all conditions. D3 antagonism had no effects.

conclusionsD1 and D2 receptor blockade and DA depletion reduce the tendency to work for sucrose under conditions that leave fundamental aspects of sucrose motivation (intake, preference, hedonic reactivity) intact. These findings have implications for studies employing sucrose intake or preference in animal models of depression.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleMotivationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3SucroseTetrabenazineDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3SucroseTetrabenazineAnergiaAnhedoniaDecision makingDepressionDopamineMotivation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.