Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25647628›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2015

Relationship Between Sunitinib Pharmacokinetics and Administration Time: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence.

Jacqueline S L Kloth, Lisette Binkhorst, Annelieke S de Wit, Peter de Bruijn, Paul Hamberg, Mei H Lam, Herman Burger, Ines Chaves, Erik A C Wiemer, Gijsbertus T J van der Horst and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy on symptoms and mortality day vs. night administration of EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline S L KlothDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, j.kloth@erasmusmc.nl.
Lisette Binkhorst
Annelieke S de Wit
Peter de Bruijn
Paul Hamberg
Mei H Lam
Herman Burger
Ines Chaves
Erik A C Wiemer
Gijsbertus T J van der Horst
Ron H J Mathijssen
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCircadian rhythms may influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs. This study aimed to elucidate whether the pharmacokinetics of the orally administered drug sunitinib are subject to circadian variation.

methodsWe performed studies in male FVB-mice aged 8-12 weeks, treated with single-dose sunitinib at six dosing times. Plasma and tissue samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis and to monitor messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. A prospective randomized crossover study was performed in which patients took sunitinib once daily at 8 a.m., 1 p.m., and 6 p.m at three subsequent courses. Patients were blindly randomized into two groups, which determined the sequence of the sunitinib dosing time. The primary endpoint in both studies was the difference in plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662 between dosing times.

resultsSunitinib and SU12662 plasma AUC in mice followed an ~12-h rhythm as a function of administration time (p ≤ 0.04). The combined AUC from time zero to 10 h (AUC10) was 14-27 % higher when sunitinib was administered at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m. than at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Twenty-four-hour rhythms were seen in the mRNA levels of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes. In 12 patients, sunitinib trough concentrations (C trough) were higher when the drug was taken at 1 p.m. or 6 p.m. than when taken at 8 a.m. (C trough-1 p.m. 66.0 ng/mL; C trough-6 p.m. 58.9 ng/mL; C trough-8 a.m. 50.7 ng/mL; p = 0.006). The AUC was not significantly different between dosing times.

conclusionsOur results indicate that sunitinib pharmacokinetics follow an ~12-h rhythm in mice. In humans, morning dosing resulted in lower C trough values, probably resulting from differences in elimination. This can have implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChronotherapyCircadian RhythmCross-Over StudiesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleHumansIndolesMaleMiceMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsIndolesPyrrolesSU 12662Sunitinib

Identifiers

PMID25647628
PMCPMC4513224
OpenAlexW1985658460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.