Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25647511›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Identification and functional analysis of healing regulators in Drosophila.

Carmen Álvarez-Fernández, Srividya Tamirisa, Federico Prada, Ariel Chernomoretz, Osvaldo Podhajcer, Enrique Blanco, Enrique Martín-Blanco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Imaginal Disc Regeneration: Something Old, Something New.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carmen Álvarez-FernándezInstituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Parc Cientific de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Srividya TamirisaInstituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Parc Cientific de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Federico PradaTerapia Molecular y Celular, Fundación Instituto Leloir, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ariel ChernomoretzDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Osvaldo PodhajcerTerapia Molecular y Celular, Fundación Instituto Leloir, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Enrique BlancoDepartament de Genètica and Institut de Biomedicina (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique Martín-BlancoInstituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Parc Cientific de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is an essential homeostatic mechanism that maintains the epithelial barrier integrity after tissue damage. Although we know the overall steps in wound healing, many of the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Genetically amenable systems, such as wound healing in Drosophila imaginal discs, do not model all aspects of the repair process. However, they do allow the less understood aspects of the healing response to be explored, e.g., which signal(s) are responsible for initiating tissue remodeling? How is sealing of the epithelia achieved? Or, what inhibitory cues cancel the healing machinery upon completion? Answering these and other questions first requires the identification and functional analysis of wound specific genes. A variety of different microarray analyses of murine and humans have identified characteristic profiles of gene expression at the wound site, however, very few functional studies in healing regulation have been carried out. We developed an experimentally controlled method that is healing-permissive and that allows live imaging and biochemical analysis of cultured imaginal discs. We performed comparative genome-wide profiling between Drosophila imaginal cells actively involved in healing versus their non-engaged siblings. Sets of potential wound-specific genes were subsequently identified. Importantly, besides identifying and categorizing new genes, we functionally tested many of their gene products by genetic interference and overexpression in healing assays. This non-saturated analysis defines a relevant set of genes whose changes in expression level are functionally significant for proper tissue repair. Amongst these we identified the TCP1 chaperonin complex as a key regulator of the actin cytoskeleton essential for the wound healing response. There is promise that our newly identified wound-healing genes will guide future work in the more complex mammalian wound healing response.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsCytoskeletonDrosophila melanogasterEpitheliumGene Expression RegulationGenome, InsectHumansImaginal DiscsJNK Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMAP Kinase Signaling SystemRegenerationSignal TransductionThoraxWound HealingActinsJNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25647511
PMCPMC4315591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.