Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25647447›Full record

Trial reportAddictive behaviors2015

Network Support treatment for alcohol dependence: gender differences in treatment mechanisms and outcomes.

Mark D Litt, Ronald M Kadden, Howard Tennen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addictive behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A randomized trial of female-specific cognitive behavior therapy for alcohol dependent women.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Trial
  3. Women with alcohol dependence: A randomized trial of couple versus individual plus couple therapy.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Review
  12. Sex and Gender Effects in Recovery From Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark D LittDivision of Behavioral Sciences and Community Health, MC3910, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Electronic address: Litt@nso.uchc.edu.
Ronald M KaddenDepartment of Psychiatry, MC3944, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Electronic address: Rkadden@uchc.edu.
Howard TennenDepartment of Community Medicine and Health Care, MC6325, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Electronic address: tennen@uchc.edu.

Funding

Network Support for Alcohol Treatment: Mechanisms and EffectivenessR01AA012827 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LITT, MARK D. · 2002 to 2013
$5.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS 1 R01 AA12827NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNetwork Support treatment was intended to help alcohol dependent patients alter their close social support networks to be more supportive of sobriety and less supportive of drinking. The purpose of the present study was to examine the differential influences of Network Support treatment on men and women.

methodsAlcohol dependent men (n=122) and women (n=88) recruited from the community were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 12-week outpatient treatment conditions: Network Support (NS), Network Support+Contingency Management (NS+CM), or Case Management (CaseM; a control condition). Patients were then followed for a period of 27 months. Multilevel modeling was used to evaluate Sex×Treatment interaction effects on outcome variables over time. Tests of mediation were used to determine what factors might account for differential effectiveness for men or women in the NS conditions.

resultsAnalyses of drinking-related outcome measures over the 27 months indicated that women fared less well overall, and particularly poorly in the Network Support conditions, relative to men. Tests of mediation indicated that self-efficacy change and change in the number of non-drinking close associates partially mediated the effect of NS treatments on outcome.

conclusionsIt was concluded that the NS conditions failed to alter women's social networks, and may have had the effect of undermining women's self-efficacy. Network Support treatment might be applicable for women and more effective generally if particular attention is paid to understanding preexisting social support networks.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdultAlcoholismAnxietyCase ManagementDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisSelf EfficacySex FactorsStress, PsychologicalTreatment OutcomeAlcohol treatmentGender differencesNetwork SupportSocial network

Identifiers

PMID25647447
PMCPMC4374024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.