Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25647098›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2015

Artificial affinity proteins as ligands of immunoglobulins.

Barbara Mouratou, Ghislaine Béhar, Frédéric Pecorari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A functional helix shuffled variant of the B domain of Staphylococcus aureus.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptation of the binding domain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. COVID-19 Vaccines: Computational tools and Development.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Affibody-Binding Ligands.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Computational tools for modern vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara MouratouINSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, 8 quai Moncousu, BP 70721, 44007 Nantes Cedex 1, France. barbara.mouratou@univ-nantes.fr.
Ghislaine BéharINSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, 8 quai Moncousu, BP 70721, 44007 Nantes Cedex 1, France.
Frédéric PecorariINSERM UMR 892 - CRCNA, 8 quai Moncousu, BP 70721, 44007 Nantes Cedex 1, France. frederic.pecorari@univ-nantes.fr.
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégrée Nantes Angers · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of natural proteins are known to have affinity and specificity for immunoglobulins. Some of them are widely used as reagents for detection or capture applications, such as Protein G and Protein A. However, these natural proteins have a defined spectrum of recognition that may not fit specific needs. With the development of combinatorial protein engineering and selection techniques, it has become possible to design artificial affinity proteins with the desired properties. These proteins, termed alternative scaffold proteins, are most often chosen for their stability, ease of engineering and cost-efficient recombinant production in bacteria. In this review, we focus on alternative scaffold proteins for which immunoglobulin binders have been identified and characterized.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer-Aided DesignHumansImmunoglobulinsLigandsProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryImmunoglobulinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25647098
PMCPMC4384111
OpenAlexW2020869684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.