Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646973›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2015

A sting in the spit: widespread cross-infection of multiple RNA viruses across wild and managed bees.

Dino P McMahon, Matthias A Fürst, Jesicca Caspar, Panagiotis Theodorou, Mark J F Brown, Robert J Paxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Virus distributions in wild bees are associated with floral communities at local to landscape scales.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Role of Pathogens in Bumblebee Decline: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dino P McMahonSchool of Biological Sciences, MBC, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.
Matthias A FürstSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 OEX, UK.
Jesicca CasparInstitute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Panagiotis TheodorouInstitute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Mark J F BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 OEX, UK.
Robert J PaxtonSchool of Biological Sciences, MBC, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/1000100/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000151/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declining populations of bee pollinators are a cause of concern, with major repercussions for biodiversity loss and food security. RNA viruses associated with honeybees represent a potential threat to other insect pollinators, but the extent of this threat is poorly understood. This study aims to attain a detailed understanding of the current and ongoing risk of emerging infectious disease (EID) transmission between managed and wild pollinator species across a wide range of RNA viruses. Within a structured large-scale national survey across 26 independent sites, we quantify the prevalence and pathogen loads of multiple RNA viruses in co-occurring managed honeybee (Apis mellifera) and wild bumblebee (Bombus spp.) populations. We then construct models that compare virus prevalence between wild and managed pollinators. Multiple RNA viruses associated with honeybees are widespread in sympatric wild bumblebee populations. Virus prevalence in honeybees is a significant predictor of virus prevalence in bumblebees, but we remain cautious in speculating over the principle direction of pathogen transmission. We demonstrate species-specific differences in prevalence, indicating significant variation in disease susceptibility or tolerance. Pathogen loads within individual bumblebees may be high and in the case of at least one RNA virus, prevalence is higher in wild bumblebees than in managed honeybee populations. Our findings indicate widespread transmission of RNA viruses between managed and wild bee pollinators, pointing to an interconnected network of potential disease pressures within and among pollinator species. In the context of the biodiversity crisis, our study emphasizes the importance of targeting a wide range of pathogens and defining host associations when considering potential drivers of population decline.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeekeepingBeesInsect VirusesMolecular Sequence DataPollinationRNA VirusesSpecies SpecificityUnited KingdomApisBombusdeclinepathogenspillover

Identifiers

PMID25646973
PMCPMC4832299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.