Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646593›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2015

Novel integrative genomic tool for interrogating lithium response in bipolar disorder.

J G Hunsberger, F L Chibane, A G Elkahloun, R Henderson, R Singh, J Lawson, C Cruceanu, V Nagarajan, G Turecki, A Squassina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. DNA hypomethylation of theFrontiers in neurology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. RNA Biomarkers in Bipolar Disorder and Response to Mood Stabilizers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic and Epigenetic Markers of Lithium Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

J G HunsbergerMolecular Neurobiology Section, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
F L ChibaneMolecular Neurobiology Section, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
A G ElkahlounNational Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
R HendersonBioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch (BCBB), Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology (OCICB), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
R SinghLockheed Martin Corporation, IS&GS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J LawsonKG Science Associates, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
C Cruceanu1] McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada [2] Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
V NagarajanBioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch (BCBB), Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology (OCICB), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
G TureckiMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
A SquassinaSection of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
C D MedeirosMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
M Del ZompoSection of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
G A RouleauMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
M AldaDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
D-M ChuangMolecular Neurobiology Section, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USDouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMcGill University · CANational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of Cagliari · ITDalhousie University · CALockheed Martin (United States) · US

Funding

Mechanisms Of Action Of Psychoactive DrugsZIAMH002468 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AMARA, SUSAN · 2009 to 2015
$10.1M
NHGRI/DIR Microarray CoreZICHG200365 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ELKAHLOUN, ABDEL · 2011 to 2025
$9.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a novel integrative genomic tool called GRANITE (Genetic Regulatory Analysis of Networks Investigational Tool Environment) that can effectively analyze large complex data sets to generate interactive networks. GRANITE is an open-source tool and invaluable resource for a variety of genomic fields. Although our analysis is confined to static expression data, GRANITE has the capability of evaluating time-course data and generating interactive networks that may shed light on acute versus chronic treatment, as well as evaluating dose response and providing insight into mechanisms that underlie therapeutic versus sub-therapeutic doses or toxic doses. As a proof-of-concept study, we investigated lithium (Li) response in bipolar disorder (BD). BD is a severe mood disorder marked by cycles of mania and depression. Li is one of the most commonly prescribed and decidedly effective treatments for many patients (responders), although its mode of action is not yet fully understood, nor is it effective in every patient (non-responders). In an in vitro study, we compared vehicle versus chronic Li treatment in patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells (LCLs) (derived from either responders or non-responders) using both microRNA (miRNA) and messenger RNA gene expression profiling. We present both Li responder and non-responder network visualizations created by our GRANITE analysis in BD. We identified by network visualization that the Let-7 family is consistently downregulated by Li in both groups where this miRNA family has been implicated in neurodegeneration, cell survival and synaptic development. We discuss the potential of this analysis for investigating treatment response and even providing clinicians with a tool for predicting treatment response in their patients, as well as for providing the industry with a tool for identifying network nodes as targets for novel drug discovery.

Indexed as

AdultAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderFemaleGenomicsHumansLithium CompoundsMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsStatistics as TopicTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntimanic AgentsLithium CompoundsMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID25646593
PMCPMC4445744
OpenAlexW2000766814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.