Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646522›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

The evolutionary roots of creativity: mechanisms and motivations.

Geraint A Wiggins, Peter Tyack, Constance Scharff, Martin Rohrmeier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
56.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stable Diffusion Models Reveal a Persisting Human-AI Gap in Visual Creativity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The More Fertile, the More Creative: Changes in Women's Creative Potential across the Ovulatory Cycle.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Principles of structure building in music, language and animal song.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  17. Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Geraint A WigginsSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4FZ, UK geraint.wiggins@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1587-112X
Peter TyackSea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8409-4790
Constance ScharffAnimal Behavior, Freie Universität Berlin, Takustraße 6, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Martin RohrmeierInstitut für Kunst- und Musikwissenschaft, Technische Universität Dresden, August-Bebel-Straße 20, Dresden 01219, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEQueen Mary University of London · GBTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the evolution of cognition and the emergence of creative behaviour, in relation to vocal communication. We address two key questions: (i) what cognitive and/or social mechanisms have evolved that afford aspects of creativity?; (ii) has natural and/or sexual selection favoured human behaviours considered 'creative'? This entails analysis of 'creativity', an imprecise construct: comparable properties in non-humans differ in magnitude and teleology from generally agreed human creativity. We then address two apparent problems: (i) the difference between merely novel productions and 'creative' ones; (ii) the emergence of creative behaviour in spite of high cost: does it fit the idea that females choose a male who succeeds in spite of a handicap (costly ornament); or that creative males capable of producing a large and complex song repertoire grew up under favourable conditions; or a demonstration of generally beneficial heightened reasoning capacity; or an opportunity to continually reinforce social bonding through changing communication tropes; or something else? We illustrate and support our argument by reference to whale and bird song; these independently evolved biological signal mechanisms objectively share surface properties with human behaviours generally called 'creative'. Studying them may elucidate mechanisms underlying human creativity; we outline a research programme to do so.

Indexed as

CreativityAnimalsBirdsCognitionCultureFemaleHumansLearningMaleModels, PsychologicalModels, TheoreticalMotivationVocalization, AnimalWhalescomputational modellingcreativityinformation theorymusicvocal communication

Identifiers

PMID25646522
PMCPMC4321140
OpenAlexW2065494991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.