Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646513›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Neural overlap in processing music and speech.

Isabelle Peretz, Dominique Vuvan, Marie-Élaine Lagrois, Jorge L Armony

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 277 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep Sound Synthesis Matched to Brain Activity Recapitulates Preferential Responses to Speech and Music.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Linguistic and Musical Syntax Processing in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle PeretzInternational Laboratory of Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), and Center for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada isabelle.peretz@umontreal.ca.
Dominique VuvanInternational Laboratory of Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), and Center for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Élaine LagroisInternational Laboratory of Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), and Center for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jorge L ArmonyInternational Laboratory of Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), and Center for Research on Brain, Language and Music (CRBLM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychiatry, McGill University and Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music · CAInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural overlap in processing music and speech, as measured by the co-activation of brain regions in neuroimaging studies, may suggest that parts of the neural circuitries established for language may have been recycled during evolution for musicality, or vice versa that musicality served as a springboard for language emergence. Such a perspective has important implications for several topics of general interest besides evolutionary origins. For instance, neural overlap is an important premise for the possibility of music training to influence language acquisition and literacy. However, neural overlap in processing music and speech does not entail sharing neural circuitries. Neural separability between music and speech may occur in overlapping brain regions. In this paper, we review the evidence and outline the issues faced in interpreting such neural data, and argue that converging evidence from several methodologies is needed before neural overlap is taken as evidence of sharing.

Indexed as

MusicAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingHumansNeural PathwaysSpeechfMRImusicneural overlapspeech

Identifiers

PMID25646513
PMCPMC4321131
OpenAlexW2098800981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.