Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646435›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Revealing the density of encoded functions in a viral RNA.

Nikesh Patel, Eric C Dykeman, Robert H A Coutts, George P Lomonossoff, David J Rowlands, Simon E V Phillips, Neil Ranson, Reidun Twarock, Roman Tuma, Peter G Stockley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physical virology: From virus self-assembly to particle mechanics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nikesh PatelAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom;
Eric C DykemanYork Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, and Departments of Mathematics and Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;
Robert H A CouttsDivision of Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;
George P LomonossoffDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norfolk NR4 7UH, United Kingdom; and.
David J RowlandsAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom;
Simon E V PhillipsResearch Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0FA, United Kingdom.
Neil RansonAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom;
Reidun TwarockYork Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, and Departments of Mathematics and Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;
Roman TumaAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom;
Peter G StockleyAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; p.g.stockley@leeds.ac.uk.
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of York · GBImperial College London · GBNorwich Research Park · GBRutherford Appleton Laboratory · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004596/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J00667X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L021803/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L022095/1Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0901251Wellcome Trust 089311/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 090932Wellcome Trust 090932/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present direct experimental evidence that assembly of a single-stranded RNA virus occurs via a packaging signal-mediated mechanism. We show that the sequences of coat protein recognition motifs within multiple, dispersed, putative RNA packaging signals, as well as their relative spacing within a genomic fragment, act collectively to influence the fidelity and yield of capsid self-assembly in vitro. These experiments confirm that the selective advantages for viral yield and encapsidation specificity, predicted from previous modeling of packaging signal-mediated assembly, are found in Nature. Regions of the genome that act as packaging signals also function in translational and transcriptional enhancement, as well as directly coding for the coat protein, highlighting the density of encoded functions within the viral RNA. Assembly and gene expression are therefore direct molecular competitors for different functional folds of the same RNA sequence. The strongest packaging signal in the test fragment, encodes a region of the coat protein that undergoes a conformational change upon contact with packaging signals. A similar phenomenon occurs in other RNA viruses for which packaging signals are known. These contacts hint at an even deeper density of encoded functions in viral RNA, which if confirmed, would have profound consequences for the evolution of this class of pathogens.

Indexed as

Capsid ProteinsRNA, ViralRNA VirusesStatic ElectricityCapsid ProteinsRNA, Viralpackaging signalsatellite tobacco necrosis virussingle-molecule fluorescence correlation spectroscopyvirus assembly

Identifiers

PMID25646435
PMCPMC4343168
OpenAlexW2142951375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.