Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646307›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2015

IFN-β treatment requires B cells for efficacy in neuroautoimmunity.

Ryan D Schubert, Yang Hu, Gaurav Kumar, Spencer Szeto, Peter Abraham, Johannes Winderl, Joel M Guthridge, Gabriel Pardo, Jeffrey Dunn, Lawrence Steinman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Dual Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Activation pathways that drive CD4Immunological reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Inflammation in multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan D SchubertDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158; and.
Yang HuDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
Gaurav KumarDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
Spencer SzetoDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
Peter AbrahamDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Johannes WinderlDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Joel M GuthridgeDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
Gabriel PardoDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
Jeffrey DunnDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Lawrence SteinmanDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Robert C AxtellDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 bob-axtell@omrf.org.
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI PAUL G SPICER · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Pre-Clinical Studies to Identify SLE Therapeutic TargetsU19AI082714 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GAFFNEY, PATRICK M · 2009 to 2018
$6.2M
Science in a Culture of MentoringP30GM103510 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JAMES, JUDITH A · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
Molecular Stratification of Multiple Sclerosis and Associated Neuro-autoimmune DiR00NS075099 · NINDS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI AXTELL, ROBERT C · 2013 to 2015
$745k
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082714NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103510NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS075099NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS075099-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IFN-β remains the most widely prescribed treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Despite widespread use of IFN-β, the therapeutic mechanism is still partially understood. Particularly, the clinical relevance of increased B cell activity during IFN-β treatment is unclear. In this article, we show that IFN-β pushes some B cells into a transitional, regulatory population that is a critical mechanism for therapy. IFN-β treatment increases the absolute number of regulatory CD19(+)CD24(++)CD38(++) transitional B cells in peripheral blood relative to treatment-naive and Copaxone-treated patients. In addition, we found that transitional B cells from both healthy controls and IFN-β-treated MS patients are potent producers of IL-10, and that the capability of IFN-β to induce IL-10 is amplified when B cells are stimulated. Similar changes are seen in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. IFN-β treatment increases transitional and regulatory B cell populations, as well as IL-10 secretion in the spleen. Furthermore, we found that IFN-β increases autoantibody production, implicating humoral immune activation in B cell regulatory responses. Finally, we demonstrate that IFN-β therapy requires immune-regulatory B cells by showing that B cell-deficient mice do not benefit clinically or histopathologically from IFN-β treatment. These results have significant implications for the diagnosis and treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityB-Lymphocyte SubsetsBrainCase-Control StudiesEncephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalFemaleGene Expression RegulationGlatiramer AcetateHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaInterleukin-10Lymphocyte DepletionAntigens, CDAutoantibodiesGlatiramer AcetateIL10 protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaInterleukin-10Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoproteinmyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (35-55)Peptide FragmentsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID25646307
PMCPMC4340715
OpenAlexW1795945271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.