Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25646145›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2015

Chiropractic identity, role and future: a survey of North American chiropractic students.

Jordan A Gliedt, Cheryl Hawk, Michelle Anderson, Kashif Ahmad, Dinah Bunn, Jerrilyn Cambron, Brian Gleberzon, John Hart, Anupama Kizhakkeveettil, Stephen M Perle and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jordan A GliedtPrivate Practice, 725 S. Dobson Rd, Suite 100, Chandler, AZ 85224 USA ; Logan University College of Chiropractic, 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO 63017 USA.
Cheryl HawkLogan University College of Chiropractic, 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO 63017 USA.
Michelle AndersonLogan University College of Chiropractic, 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO 63017 USA.
Kashif AhmadNorthwestern University of Health Sciences, 2501 W. 84th St, Bloomington, MN 55431 USA.
Dinah BunnNorthwestern University of Health Sciences, 2501 W. 84th St, Bloomington, MN 55431 USA.
Jerrilyn CambronNational University of Health Sciences, 200 E. Roosevelt Rd, Lombard, IL 60148 USA.
Brian GleberzonCanadian Memorial College of Chiropractic, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
John HartSherman College of Chiropractic, 2020 Springfield Rd, Boiling Springs, SC 29316 USA.
Anupama KizhakkeveettilSouthern California University of Health Sciences, 16200 E. Amber Valley Dr., Whittier, CA 90604 USA.
Stephen M PerleUniversity of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT 06604 USA.
Michael RamcharanTexas Chiropractic College, 5912 Spencer Highway, Pasadena, TX 77505 USA.
Stephanie SullivanLife University, 1269 Barclay Circle, Marietta, GA 30060 USA.
Liang ZhangPalmer College of Chiropractic - Florida, 4777 City Center Parkway, Port Orange, FL 32129 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe literature pertaining to chiropractic students' opinions with respect to the desired future status of the chiropractic physician is limited and is an appropriate topic worthy of study. A previous pilot study was performed at a single chiropractic college. This current study is an expansion of this pilot project to collect data from chiropractic students enrolled in colleges throughout North America.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to investigate North American chiropractic students' opinions concerning professional identity, role and future.

methodsA 23-item cross-sectional electronic questionnaire was developed. A total of 7,455 chiropractic students from 12 North American English-speaking chiropractic colleges were invited to complete the survey. Survey items encompassed demographics, evidence-based practice, chiropractic identity and setting, and scope of practice. Data were collected and descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

resultsA total of 1,247 (16.7% response rate) questionnaires were electronically submitted. Most respondents agreed (34.8%) or strongly agreed (52.2%) that it is important for chiropractors to be educated in evidence-based practice. A majority agreed (35.6%) or strongly agreed (25.8%) the emphasis of chiropractic intervention is to eliminate vertebral subluxations/vertebral subluxation complexes. A large number of respondents (55.2%) were not in favor of expanding the scope of the chiropractic profession to include prescribing medications with appropriate advanced training. Most respondents estimated that chiropractors should be considered mainstream health care practitioners (69.1%). Several respondents (46.8%) think that chiropractic research should focus on the physiological mechanisms of chiropractic adjustments.

conclusionThe chiropractic students in this study showed a preference for participating in mainstream health care, report an exposure to evidence-based practice, and desire to hold to traditional chiropractic theories and practices. The majority of students would like to see an emphasis on correction of vertebral subluxation, while a larger percent found it is important to learn about evidence-based practice. These two key points may seem contradictory, suggesting cognitive dissonance. Or perhaps some students want to hold on to traditional theory (e.g., subluxation-centered practice) while recognizing the need for further research to fully explore these theories. Further research on this topic is needed.

Indexed as

ChiropracticCross-sectional survey

Identifiers

PMID25646145
PMCPMC4313466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.