Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25645874›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2015

Quantitative and logic modelling of molecular and gene networks.

Nicolas Le Novère

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. FAIRification of computational models in biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Novel Signaling Network for Heart Growth With Local IGF1 Production.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Guidelines for mechanistic modeling and analysis in cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicolas Le NovèreBabraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaviours of complex biomolecular systems are often irreducible to the elementary properties of their individual components. Explanatory and predictive mathematical models are therefore useful for fully understanding and precisely engineering cellular functions. The development and analyses of these models require their adaptation to the problems that need to be solved and the type and amount of available genetic or molecular data. Quantitative and logic modelling are among the main methods currently used to model molecular and gene networks. Each approach comes with inherent advantages and weaknesses. Recent developments show that hybrid approaches will become essential for further progress in synthetic biology and in the development of virtual organisms.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalSoftwareAnimalsData MiningHumansSynthetic BiologySystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID25645874
PMCPMC4604653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.