Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25645849›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Efficacy of ETI-204 monoclonal antibody as an adjunct therapy in a New Zealand white rabbit partial survival model for inhalational anthrax.

Bethany Biron, Katie Beck, David Dyer, Marc Mattix, Nancy Twenhafel, Aysegul Nalca

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bethany BironCenter for Aerobiological Sciences, United States Army Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Katie BeckCenter for Aerobiological Sciences, United States Army Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
David DyerCenter for Aerobiological Sciences, United States Army Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Marc MattixPathology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Nancy TwenhafelPathology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Aysegul NalcaCenter for Aerobiological Sciences, United States Army Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA aysegul.nalca@us.army.mil.
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalational anthrax is characterized by extensive bacteremia and toxemia as well as nonspecific to mild flu-like symptoms, until the onset of hypotension, shock, and mortality. Without treatment, the mortality rate approaches 100%. Antibiotic treatment is not always effective, and alternative treatments are needed, such as monotherapy for antibiotic-resistant inhalational anthrax or as an adjunct therapy in combination with antibiotics. The Bacillus anthracis antitoxin monoclonal antibody (MAb) ETI-204 is a high-affinity chimeric deimmunized antibody which targets the anthrax toxin protective antigen (PA). In this study, a partial protection New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit model was used to evaluate the protective efficacy of the adjunct therapy with the MAb. Following detection of PA in the blood, NZW rabbits were administered either an antibiotic (doxycycline) alone or the antibiotic in conjunction with ETI-204. Survival was evaluated to compare the efficacy of the combination adjunct therapy with that of an antibiotic alone in treating inhalational anthrax. Overall, the results from this study indicate that a subtherapeutic regimen consisting of an antibiotic in combination with an anti-PA MAb results in increased survival compared to the antibiotic alone and would provide an effective therapeutic strategy against symptomatic anthrax in nonvaccinated individuals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthraxAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntitoxinsBacillus anthracisBacteremiaBrainDoxycyclineFemaleInhalation ExposureMaleRabbitsSpores, BacterialSurvival AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntitoxinsDoxycyclineobiltoxaximab

Identifiers

PMID25645849
PMCPMC4356799
OpenAlexW2168105401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.