Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25645844›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Ceftaroline activity against bacterial pathogens frequently isolated in U.S. medical centers: results from five years of the AWARE surveillance program.

Helio S Sader, Robert K Flamm, Jennifer M Streit, David J Farrell, Ronald N Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Incidence and risk factors for mortality in patients treated with combined ceftaroline for Gram-positive infective endocarditis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helio S SaderJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA helio-sader@jmilabs.com.
Robert K FlammJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Jennifer M StreitJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
David J FarrellJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Ronald N JonesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 84,704 isolates were collected from 191 medical centers in 2009 to 2013 and tested for susceptibility to ceftaroline and comparator agents by broth microdilution methods. Ceftaroline inhibited all Staphylococcus aureus isolates at ≤2 μg/ml and was very active against methicillin-resistant strains (MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 1 μg/ml; 97.6% susceptible). Among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, the highest ceftaroline MIC was 0.5 μg/ml, and ceftaroline activity against the most common Enterobacteriaceae species (MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml; 78.9% susceptible) was similar to that of ceftriaxone (MIC50, ≤0.25 μg/ml; 86.8% susceptible).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCeftarolineCeftriaxoneCephalosporinsEnterobacteriaceaeHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCeftriaxoneCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID25645844
PMCPMC4356765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.