Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25645249›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology

Strength in numbers: quantitative single-molecule RNA detection assays.

Imre Gaspar, Anne Ephrussi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A fastFly · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recent advances in tools to map the microbiome.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  15. Annealed ZnO/AlNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Imre GasparDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne Ephrussi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGene expression is a fundamental process that underlies development, homeostasis, and behavior of organisms. The fact that it relies on nucleic acid intermediates, which can specifically interact with complementary probes, provides an excellent opportunity for studying the multiple steps--transcription, RNA processing, transport, translation, degradation, and so forth--through which gene function manifests. Over the past three decades, the toolbox of nucleic acid science has expanded tremendously, making high-precision in situ detection of DNA and RNA possible. This has revealed that many--probably the vast majority of--transcripts are distributed within the cytoplasm or the nucleus in a nonrandom fashion. With the development of microscopy techniques we have learned not only about the qualitative localization of these molecules but also about their absolute numbers with great precision. Single-molecule techniques for nucleic acid detection have been transforming our views of biology with elementary power: cells are not average members of their population but are highly distinct individuals with greatly and suddenly changing gene expression, and this behavior of theirs can be measured, modeled, and thus predicted and, finally, comprehended. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansModels, BiologicalNucleic Acid HybridizationRNAFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID25645249
PMCPMC5024021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.