ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2015
Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity of Capillary POCT for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Salivary Glucose Testing for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence and Methodological Heterogeneity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Using Technology to Improve Diabetes Care in Hospital: The Challenge and the Opportunity.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- How Can Point-of-Care Technologies Support In-Hospital Diabetes Care?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- A Flexible Dual-Analyte Electrochemical Biosensor for Salivary Glucose and Lactate Detection.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Outcomes Using a Tablet-Based System to Support Glycemic Management Workflow Operations: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of medical systems · 2020Observational
- Evaluation of the Abbot FreeStyle Optium Neo H blood glucose meter in the hyperbaric oxygen environment.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2020Article
- Measurement of Hyperglycemia and Impact on Health Outcomes in People With Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.Oncology nursing forum · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucose control in the hospital setting is very important. There is a high incidence of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability in hospitalized patients. Safe insulin delivery and glucose control is dependent on reliable glucose meters and monitoring systems in the hospital. Different glucose monitoring systems use arterial, venous, central venous, and capillary blood samples. It is important for clinicians to be aware that there are limitations of specific point-of-care (POC) glucose meters and that situations exist whereby POC glucose meters as the sole measurement device should be avoided. POC meter devices are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in critical care, although POC meter devices are commonly used in critical care settings and elsewhere. This review focuses on glucose assay principles, instrument technology, influences on glucose measurement, standards for glucose measurement, and an evaluation of different methods to measure blood glucose in the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.