Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25644792›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2015

Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a service evaluation.

Rachel M Coyle, Hooi-Ling Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Barriers and facilitators to providing facility-based emergency care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed methods study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  3. Emergency care capacity of private primary healthcare facilities in Gauteng, South Africa.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Emergency care capacity in Sierra Leone: A multicentre analysis.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emergency Services Capacity of a Rural Community in Guatemala.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Emergency and critical care services in Malawi: Findings from a nationwide survey of health facilities.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel M CoyleDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, King's College, London, England, SE1 3QD, UK. rachelcoyle@nhs.net.
Hooi-Ling HarrisonKing's Sierra Leone Partnership, King's Centre for Global Health, Weston Education Centre, London, England, SE5 9RJ, UK. hooi-ling.harrison@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing global recognition of the role of emergency medical services in improving population health. Emergency medical services remain underdeveloped in many low income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. There have been no previous evaluations of specialist emergency and critical care services in Sierra Leone.

methodsEmergency care capacity was evaluated at a sample of seven public and private hospitals in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone. A structured set of minimum standards necessary to deliver emergency and critical care in the low-income setting was used to evaluate capacity. The key dimensions of capacity evaluated were infrastructure, human resources, drug and equipment availability, training, systems, guidelines and diagnostics. A score for each dimension of capacity was calculated based on the availability of a list of specified indicators within each dimension. In addition, an Emergency Care Capacity Score was calculated to demonstrate a composite measure of capacity based on the various indicator scores. This method has been used by the World Health Organisation in evaluating the availability and readiness of healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries.

resultsSubstantial deficiencies in capacity were demonstrated across the range of indicators and predominantly affecting publically funded facilities. Capacity was weakest in the domain of infrastructure, with an average score of 43%, while the strongest areas of capacity overall were in drug availability, 82%, and human resources, 79%. A marked disparity was noted between public and private healthcare facilities with consistently lower capacity in the former. The overall Emergency Care Capacity Score was 66%.

conclusionThere are substantial deficiencies in emergency care systems in public hospitals in Freetown which are likely to compromise effective care. This represents a serious barrier to access to emergency healthcare. Emergency care systems have an important role in improving population health and as such should a priority for local policy makers.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEmergency Medical ServicesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicHumansSierra LeoneWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID25644792
PMCPMC4320466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.