Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25644606›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2015

Cytokinesis breaks dicentric chromosomes preferentially at pericentromeric regions and telomere fusions.

Virginia Lopez, Natalja Barinova, Masayuki Onishi, Sabrina Pobiega, John R Pringle, Karine Dubrana, Stéphane Marcand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia LopezLaboratoire Télomères et Réparation du Chromosome, Service Instabilité Génétique Réparation et Recombinaison, Institut de Radiobiologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMR967, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France;
Natalja BarinovaLaboratoire Télomères et Réparation du Chromosome, Service Instabilité Génétique Réparation et Recombinaison, Institut de Radiobiologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMR967, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France;
Masayuki OnishiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
Sabrina PobiegaLaboratoire Télomères et Réparation du Chromosome, Service Instabilité Génétique Réparation et Recombinaison, Institut de Radiobiologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMR967, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France;
John R PringleDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
Karine DubranaUMR967, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire Instabilité Génétique et Organisation Nucléaire, Service Instabilité Génétique Réparation et Recombinaison, Institut de Radiobiologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Stéphane MarcandLaboratoire Télomères et Réparation du Chromosome, Service Instabilité Génétique Réparation et Recombinaison, Institut de Radiobiologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMR967, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; stephane.marcand@cea.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dicentric chromosomes are unstable products of erroneous DNA repair events that can lead to further genome rearrangements and extended gene copy number variations. During mitosis, they form anaphase bridges, resulting in chromosome breakage by an unknown mechanism. In budding yeast, dicentrics generated by telomere fusion break at the fusion, a process that restores the parental karyotype and protects cells from rare accidental telomere fusion. Here, we observed that dicentrics lacking telomere fusion preferentially break within a 25- to 30-kb-long region next to the centromeres. In all cases, dicentric breakage requires anaphase exit, ruling out stretching by the elongated mitotic spindle as the cause of breakage. Instead, breakage requires cytokinesis. In the presence of dicentrics, the cytokinetic septa pinch the nucleus, suggesting that dicentrics are severed after actomyosin ring contraction. At this time, centromeres and spindle pole bodies relocate to the bud neck, explaining how cytokinesis can sever dicentrics near centromeres.

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakageCytokinesisCell Nucleus DivisionCentromereChromosomes, FungalMitosisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTelomerecell cycle exitcentromerechromosomecytokinesistelomere

Identifiers

PMID25644606
PMCPMC4318148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.