Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25644329›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2015

Balancing vancomycin efficacy and nephrotoxicity: should we be aiming for trough or AUC/MIC?

Karisma Patel, Ashley S Crumby, Holly D Maples

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanisms of antimicrobial-induced nephrotoxicity in children.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Expanding Existing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Pediatrics: What Comes Next.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2018
    Review
  11. Incidence and Risk Factors for Vancomycin Nephrotoxicity in Acutely Ill Pediatric Patients.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karisma PatelInfectious Diseases, Children's Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
Ashley S Crumby
Holly D Maples

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixty years later, the question that still remains is how to appropriately utilize vancomycin in the pediatric population. The Infectious Diseases Society of America published guidelines in 2011 that provide guidance for dosing and monitoring of vancomycin in adults and pediatrics. However, goal vancomycin trough concentrations of 15-20 μg/mL for invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were based primarily on adult pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data that achieved an area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC) of ≥400. Recent pediatric literature shows that vancomycin trough concentrations needed to achieve the target AUC/MIC are different than the adult goal troughs cited in the guidelines. This paper addresses several thoughts, including the role of vancomycin AUC/MIC in dosing strategies and safety monitoring, consistency in laboratory reporting, and future directions for calculating AUC/MIC in pediatrics.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveChildHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.