Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25644223›Full record

SynthesisThe patient2015

Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Nicole K Schatz, Gregory A Fabiano, Charles E Cunningham, Susan dosReis, Daniel A Waschbusch, Stephanie Jerome, Kellina Lupas, Karen L Morris

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The patient, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Does Giving Parents Their Choice of Interventions for Child Behavior Problems Improve Child Outcomes?Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Impact of COVID-19 on Children's Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptomology, Daily Life, and Problem Behavior During Virtual Learning.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Eliciting preferences for continuing medication among adult patients and parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Toward Precision Medicine in ADHD.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole K SchatzDepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 3rd Floor, Diefendorf Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA. nkschatz@buffalo.edu.
Gregory A FabianoDepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 3rd Floor, Diefendorf Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Charles E CunninghamJack Laidlaw Chair in Patient-Centered Health Care, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Susan dosReisPharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel A WaschbuschPenn State Hershey Medical Group Psychiatry, Penn State Hershey, Hershey, PA, USA.
Stephanie JeromeDepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 3rd Floor, Diefendorf Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Kellina LupasDepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 3rd Floor, Diefendorf Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Karen L MorrisDepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 3rd Floor, Diefendorf Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient preferences are an important topic of study with respect to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) interventions, as there are multiple treatment choices available, multiple developmental levels to consider, and multiple potential individuals involved in treatment (children, parents, and adults with ADHD). Stated preference methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE), best-worst scaling (BWS), and other utility value methods such as standard gamble interview (SGI) and time trade-off (TTO) are becoming more common in research addressing preferences for ADHD treatments. A synthesis of this research may facilitate improved patient-centered and family-centered treatment for ADHD.

objectiveThe purpose of this review was to synthesize reports across existing DCE, BWS, TTO, and SGI studies to assess which aspects of ADHD treatment are most studied as well as most preferred and influential in treatment decisions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 41 studies referring to preferences for ADHD treatment were identified through the initial search and contact with researchers. Of these, 13 reported ADHD treatment preference data from a study using DCE, BWS, or SGI methods. No TTO studies were identified that met inclusion criteria.

resultsMethods and designs varied considerably across studies. Relatively few studies focused on preferences among children, adolescents, and adults compared with those that focused on the preferences of parents of children with ADHD. The majority of studies focused primarily on medication treatments, with many fewer focused on psychosocial treatments. Some studies indicated that parents of children with ADHD prefer to avoid stimulant medications in favor of behavioral or psychosocial interventions. Others report that parents see medication as a preferred treatment. Treatment outcome is a particularly salient attribute for treatment decisions for many informants.

conclusionsPotential outcomes of various treatments play a proximal role in patients' and families' decisions for ADHD treatment. Because the majority of studies focus on medication treatments for children with ADHD, more research is necessary to understand preferences related to behavioral and other psychosocial treatments both as stand-alone interventions and used in combination with medication. Additional research is also needed to assess the treatment preferences of adults with ADHD. In general, DCE, BWS, and SGI methods allow measurement of patient preferences in a manner that approximates the uncertainty and trade-offs inherent in real-world treatment decision making and provides valuable information to inform patient-centered and family-centered treatment.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleParentsPatient ParticipationPatient Preference

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.