Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25644088›Full record

ReviewCancer letters2015

Dietary agents for prevention and treatment of lung cancer.

Naghma Khan, Hasan Mukhtar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naghma KhanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Hasan MukhtarDepartment of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: hmukhtar@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Inhibition in the progression of preinvasive lung cancer by pomegranate.R03CA153961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KHAN, NAGHMA · 2011 to 2012
$149k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA153961NCI NIH HHS R03CA153961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is a prominent cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. The main reason for high mortality due to lung cancer is attributable to the fact that the diagnosis is generally made when it has spread beyond a curable stage and cannot be treated surgically or with radiation therapy. Therefore, new approaches like dietary modifications could be extremely useful in reducing lung cancer incidences. Several fruits and vegetables offer a variety of bioactive compounds to afford protection against several diseases, including lung cancer. A number of research studies involving dietary agents provide strong evidence for their role in the prevention and treatment of lung cancer, and have identified their molecular mechanisms of action and potential targets. In this review article, we summarize data from in-vitro and in-vivo studies and where available, in clinical trials, on the effects of some of the most promising dietary agents against lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdministration, OralAnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCatechinCurcuminFlavonoidsFlavonolsHumansIndolesIsothiocyanatesLung NeoplasmsPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCatechinCurcuminepigallocatechin gallatefisetinFlavonoidsFlavonolsindole-3-carbinolIndolesIsothiocyanatesPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsDietary agentsLung cancerPreventionTreatment

Identifiers

PMID25644088
PMCPMC4409137
OpenAlexW2088144811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.