Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2015
Alteration of anal sphincter function in patients with levator avulsion: observational study.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transperineal Ultrasound Immediately After Birth to Predict Postpartum Anorectal Dysfunction: A Prospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- How to Avoid Becoming a Risk Factor of Fecal Incontinence Due to OASIS-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe prevalence of levator avulsion after vaginal delivery ranges from 10 to 30 %. To our knowledge, no previous studies have used anorectal manometry (AM) to assess this injury's impact on the functionality of the anal sphincter complex. We hypothesized that women with levator avulsion have lower manometric pressures.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on 83 women, 61 in the birth group and 22 in the control group. Patients in the deliveries group were recruited in the period immediately postpartum. The control group was recruited through hospital announcements. All patients underwent 3D transperineal (3D TPUS) and 2D endoanal ultrasound (2D EAUS), as well as AM at 6 months postpartum. Median maximum resting and squeeze pressures were measured, and the presence or absence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and/or occult sphincter injury was evaluated.
resultsHiatal area at rest was significantly higher in women with vaginal birth compared with controls (p = 0.02) and there was a trend toward statistical significance compared with the cesarean section group (p = 0058). No statistical differences were observed for the hiatal area regarding Valsalva, external anal sphincter thickness, and internal anal sphincter thickness among groups. There was a significantly higher prevalence of levator avulsion in the vaginal birth group (32.43 %) compared with the controls (0 %) and the cesarean section group (5.8 %; p < 0001). There were 5 occult sphincter injuries detected at ultrasound, all of them in the vaginal birth group. Lower squeeze pressure was observed in patients with levator injury compared with control group patients and patients without avulsion (112.2 mmHg vs 128.2 mmHg and 121.2mmH; p = 0.032). Finally, there was no difference in resting pressure (p = 0.541) or squeeze pressure (p = 0.449) between patients with and those without occult anal sphincter injuries.
conclusionsLevator avulsion is associated with lower manometric squeeze pressure (p = 0.032).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.