Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25643938›Full record

ReviewJournal of surgical oncology2015

The relationship of perioperative fluid administration to outcomes in colorectal and pancreatic surgery: a review of the literature.

Oliver S Eng, Laleh G Melstrom, Darren R Carpizo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Single-Center Retrospective Study of Selected Clinical Parameters and Intraoperative Fluid Management of Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  3. Fluid Overload.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  4. Perioperative Fluid Administration in Pancreatic Surgery: a Comparison of Three Regimens.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Perioperative Net Fluid Balance Predicts Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver S EngDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Laleh G Melstrom
Darren R Carpizo

Funding

Exploration of a Mutant p53 Reactivating CompoundK08CA172676 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI CARPIZO, DARREN RICHARD · 2013 to 2017
$745k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA172676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal perioperative fluid administration in major gastrointestinal surgery remains a challenging clinical problem. Traditional dogma of a liberal approach to fluid administration in order to counteract potential hypovolemia and decreased end-organ perfusion can often result in fluid overload, perhaps negatively impacting perioperative outcomes. This hypothesis has been investigated in several types of gastrointestinal surgery. We discuss the current literature on perioperative fluid administration in colorectal and pancreatic surgery and highlight the controversies that still exist.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLength of StayPancreatic NeoplasmsPerioperative CarePostoperative Complicationscolorectalfluidoutcomespancreaticsurgery

Identifiers

PMID25643938
PMCPMC4499324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.