Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25643705›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2015

BRCA1 Circos: a visualisation resource for functional analysis of missense variants.

Ankita Jhuraney, Aneliya Velkova, Randall C Johnson, Bailey Kessing, Renato S Carvalho, Phillip Whiley, Amanda B Spurdle, Maaike P G Vreeswijk, Sandrine M Caputo, Gael A Millot and 21 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DNA double-strand break repair in cancer: A path to achieving precision medicine.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Ankita JhuraneyCancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA University of South Florida Cancer Biology PhD Program, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Aneliya VelkovaCancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Randall C JohnsonFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Fredrick, Maryland, USA.
Bailey KessingFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Fredrick, Maryland, USA.
Renato S CarvalhoInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Divisão de Farmacologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Phillip WhileyGenetics and Population Health Division, QIMR, BNE, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amanda B SpurdleGenetics and Population Health Division, QIMR, BNE, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Maaike P G VreeswijkDepartment of Human Genetics, Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sandrine M CaputoService de Génétique, Institut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Paris, France.
Gael A MillotInstitut Curie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Ana VegaFundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago, Spain.
Nicolas CoquelleDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Alvaro GalliInstituto di Fisiologia Clinica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy.
Diana EcclesUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Marinus J BlokDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Tuya PalCancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Rob B van der LuijtDepartment of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marta Santamariña PenaCIBERER, Madrid, Spain.
Susan L NeuhausenDepartment of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Talia DonenbergUniversity of Miami Medical School, Miami, Florida, USA.
Eva MachackovaDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Simon ThomasSalisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Maxime ValléeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Fergus J CouchDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sean V TavtigianHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J N Mark GloverDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Marcelo A CarvalhoInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Divisão de Farmacologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lawrence C BrodyGenome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Shyam K SharanCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Alvaro N MonteiroCancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles Consortium
Moffitt Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Alberta · CACentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRCity of Hope · USFundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica · ESHuntsman Cancer Institute · USInstitut Curie · FRInstituto Nacional do Câncer · BRIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZMayo Clinic in Florida · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USRio de Janeiro Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology · BRSalisbury District Hospital · GBSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
CCR Collaborative Bioinformatics ResourceZICBC011532 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MALIK, MARIAM · 2013 to 2025
$33.7M
BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancerR01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Integrative Molecular Epidemiology WorkshopR25CA174664 · NCI · AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI Shelley S Tworoger · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancer riskU01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
The role of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene in the pathogenesis of breast cancerZIAHG000120 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BRODY, LAWRENCE C · 2009 to 2019
$980k
NCI NIH HHS CA116167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116167NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174664NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116167World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInactivating germline mutations in the tumour suppressor gene BRCA1 are associated with a significantly increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. A large number (>1500) of unique BRCA1 variants have been identified in the population and can be classified as pathogenic, non-pathogenic or as variants of unknown significance (VUS). Many VUS are rare missense variants leading to single amino acid changes. Their impact on protein function cannot be directly inferred from sequence information, precluding assessment of their pathogenicity. Thus, functional assays are critical to assess the impact of these VUS on protein activity. BRCA1 is a multifunctional protein and different assays have been used to assess the impact of variants on different biochemical activities and biological processes. METHODS AND

resultsTo facilitate VUS analysis, we have developed a visualisation resource that compiles and displays functional data on all documented BRCA1 missense variants. BRCA1 Circos is a web-based visualisation tool based on the freely available Circos software package. The BRCA1 Circos web tool (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/circos/) aggregates data from all published BRCA1 missense variants for functional studies, harmonises their results and presents various functionalities to search and interpret individual-level functional information for each BRCA1 missense variant.

conclusionsThis research visualisation tool will serve as a quick one-stop publically available reference for all the BRCA1 missense variants that have been functionally assessed. It will facilitate meta-analysis of functional data and improve assessment of pathogenicity of VUS.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsInternetMutation, MissenseSoftwareBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabase Management SystemsDatabases, GeneticDatasets as TopicDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA1Cancer: breastClinical geneticsMolecular genetics

Identifiers

PMID25643705
PMCPMC4392196
OpenAlexW2098230498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.