Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25643702›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Sleep and use of electronic devices in adolescence: results from a large population-based study.

Mari Hysing, Ståle Pallesen, Kjell Morten Stormark, Reidar Jakobsen, Astri J Lundervold, Børge Sivertsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Digital Devices Use and Sleep in Adolescents: An Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Adolescents' daily affect predicts their mobile phone use (not the other way around).Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mari HysingRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kjell Morten StormarkRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Reidar JakobsenRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
Astri J LundervoldRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Børge SivertsenDivision of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway Department of Psychiatry, Helse Fonna HF, Haugesund, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdolescents spend increasingly more time on electronic devices, and sleep deficiency rising in adolescents constitutes a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to investigate daytime screen use and use of electronic devices before bedtime in relation to sleep.

designA large cross-sectional population-based survey study from 2012, the youth@hordaland study, in Hordaland County in Norway.

settingCross-sectional general community-based study.

participants9846 adolescents from three age cohorts aged 16-19. The main independent variables were type and frequency of electronic devices at bedtime and hours of screen-time during leisure time. OUTCOMES: Sleep variables calculated based on self-report including bedtime, rise time, time in bed, sleep duration, sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset.

resultsAdolescents spent a large amount of time during the day and at bedtime using electronic devices. Daytime and bedtime use of electronic devices were both related to sleep measures, with an increased risk of short sleep duration, long sleep onset latency and increased sleep deficiency. A dose-response relationship emerged between sleep duration and use of electronic devices, exemplified by the association between PC use and risk of less than 5 h of sleep (OR=2.70, 95% CI 2.14 to 3.39), and comparable lower odds for 7-8 h of sleep (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.96).

conclusionsUse of electronic devices is frequent in adolescence, during the day as well as at bedtime. The results demonstrate a negative relation between use of technology and sleep, suggesting that recommendations on healthy media use could include restrictions on electronic devices.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorElectronicsSleepTechnologyAdolescentCell PhoneComputersCross-Sectional StudiesDisorders of Excessive SomnolenceElectrical Equipment and SuppliesFemaleHumansMaleNorwayRisk FactorsSchoolsadolescentsEPIDEMIOLOGYmedia usesleep

Identifiers

PMID25643702
PMCPMC4316480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.