Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25643102›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2015

On the assumption of bivariate normality in selection models: a Copula approach applied to estimating HIV prevalence.

Mark E McGovern, Till Bärnighausen, Giampiero Marra, Rosalba Radice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bounding Bias Due to Selection.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark E McGovernFrom the aHarvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA; bDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; cWellcome Trust Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Mtubatuba, South Africa; dDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK; and eDepartment of Economics, Mathematics and Statistics, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Till Bärnighausen
Giampiero Marra
Rosalba Radice

Funding

The Center for the Global Demography of AgingP30AG024409 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI BLOOM, DAVID E · 2004 to 2019
$7.9M
Understanding causal pathways of HIV acquisition and transmission: a multi-level,R01HD058482 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS 1 P30 AG 024409-09NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024409NICHD NIH HHS 1R01-HD058482-01NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058482Wellcome Trust 097410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeckman-type selection models have been used to control HIV prevalence estimates for selection bias when participation in HIV testing and HIV status are associated after controlling for observed variables. These models typically rely on the strong assumption that the error terms in the participation and the outcome equations that comprise the model are distributed as bivariate normal.

methodsWe introduce a novel approach for relaxing the bivariate normality assumption in selection models using copula functions. We apply this method to estimating HIV prevalence and new confidence intervals (CI) in the 2007 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) by using interviewer identity as the selection variable that predicts participation (consent to test) but not the outcome (HIV status).

resultsWe show in a simulation study that selection models can generate biased results when the bivariate normality assumption is violated. In the 2007 Zambia DHS, HIV prevalence estimates are similar irrespective of the structure of the association assumed between participation and outcome. For men, we estimate a population HIV prevalence of 21% (95% CI = 16%-25%) compared with 12% (11%-13%) among those who consented to be tested; for women, the corresponding figures are 19% (13%-24%) and 16% (15%-17%).

conclusionsCopula approaches to Heckman-type selection models are a useful addition to the methodological toolkit of HIV epidemiology and of epidemiology in general. We develop the use of this approach to systematically evaluate the robustness of HIV prevalence estimates based on selection models, both empirically and in a simulation study.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleNormal DistributionPrevalenceSelection BiasZambia

Identifiers

PMID25643102
PMCPMC4726739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.