Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2015
Successful mobilization of PBSCs predicts favorable outcomes in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents and autologous transplantation.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Optimal infused CD34Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Risk factors of early disease progression and decreased survival for multiple myeloma patients after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Review
- Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with lenograstim in multiple myeloma patients: Prospective multicenter observational study (KMM122).Cancer medicine · 2023Observational
- Pre-mobilization platelet count predicts stem cell yield during mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023Article
- Engineering Islets From Stem Cells: The Optimal Solution for the Treatment of Diabetes?Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Is neutropenic fever an obstacle to effective stem cell harvesting?Asian journal of transfusion scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Incorporation of novel agents into auto-SCT for patients with multiple myeloma has led to improvement in their outcomes. However, the effects of new drugs, either single or combined, on PBSC mobilization have not been fully evaluated, particularly in phase 3 clinical studies. We analyzed the impact of two novel agent-based induction treatments in patients enrolled in the GIMEMA MMY-3006 study comparing bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) in preparation for double auto-SCT. Results showed that a short-term induction therapy with VTD did not adversely affect CD34(+) cell yields as compared with TD (9.75 vs 10.76 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, P=0.220). For poor mobilizers (<4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg), 5-year rates of time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter than for successful mobilizers (TTP:17 vs 48%, P<0.0001; PFS: 16 vs 46%, P<0.0001; OS: 50 vs 80%, P<0.0001). These differences were retained across patients randomized to the TD arm; conversely, no differences in outcomes were seen in patients treated with VTD, irrespective of the number of harvested CD34(+) cells. The number of collected PBSCs predicted better outcomes after auto-SCT and VTD overcame the negative impact of a poor stem cell mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.