Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25642363›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2014

Disaster-driven evacuation and medication loss: a systematic literature review.

Sae Ochi, Susan Hodgson, Owen Landeg, Lidia Mayner, Virginia Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Thinking Health-related Behaviors in a Climate Change Context: A Narrative Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exposure Assessment for Tropical Cyclone Epidemiology.Current environmental health reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Hospitals as disaster victims: Lessons not learned?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. What Happened to People with Non-Communicable Diseases during COVID-19: Implications of H-EDRM Policies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Preliminary Assessment of Hurricane Harvey Exposures and Mental Health Impact.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sae OchiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan.
Susan HodgsonSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Owen LandegExtreme Events and Health Protection, Public Health England, London, UK.
Lidia MaynerFlinders University Disaster Research Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Virginia MurrayExtreme Events and Health Protection, Public Health England, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this systematic literature review was to identify the extent and implications of medication loss and the burden of prescription refill on medical relief teams following extreme weather events and other natural hazards.

methodThe search strategy followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Key health journal databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care, and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)) were searched via the OvidSP search engine. Search terms were identified by consulting MeSH terms. The inclusion criteria comprised articles published from January 2003 to August 2013, written in English and containing an abstract. The exclusion criteria included abstracts for conferences or dissertations, book chapters and articles written in a language other than English. A total of 70 articles which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review.

resultsAll relevant information was collated regarding medication loss, prescription loss and refills, and medical aids loss which indicated a significant burden on the medical relief teams. Data also showed the difficulty in filling prescriptions due to lack of information from the evacuees. People with chronic conditions are most at risk when their medication is not available. This systematic review also showed that medical aids such as eye glasses, hearing aids as well as dental treatment are a high necessity among evacuees. DISCUSSION: This systematic review revealed that a considerable number of patients lose their medication during evacuation, many lose essential medical aids such as insulin pens and many do not bring prescriptions with them when evacuated.. Since medication loss is partly a responsibility of evacuees, understanding the impact of medication loss may lead to raising awareness and better preparations among the patients and health care professionals. People who are not prepared could have worse outcomes and many risk dying when their medication is not available.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.