Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25642172›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014

Contralateral efferent suppression of human hearing sensitivity.

Enzo Aguilar, Peter T Johannesen, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enzo AguilarAuditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.
Peter T JohannesenAuditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.
Enrique A Lopez-PovedaAuditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed at characterizing the suppressing effect of contralateral medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents on human auditory sensitivity and mechanical cochlear responses at sound levels near behavioral thresholds. Absolute thresholds for pure tones of 500 and 4000 Hz with durations between 10-500 ms were measured in the presence and in the absence of a contralateral broadband noise. The intensity of the noise was fixed at 60 dB SPL to evoke the contralateral MOC reflex without evoking the middle-ear muscle reflex. In agreement with previously reported findings, thresholds measured without the contralateral noise decreased with increasing tone duration, and the rate of decrease was faster at 500 than at 4000 Hz. Contralateral stimulation increased thresholds by 1.07 and 1.72 dB at 500 and 4000 Hz, respectively. The mean increase (1.4 dB) just missed statistical significance (p = 0.08). Importantly, the across-frequency mean threshold increase was significantly greater for long than for short probes. This effect was more obvious at 4000 Hz than at 500 Hz. Assuming that thresholds depend on the MOC-dependent cochlear mechanical response followed by an MOC-independent, post-mechanical detection mechanism, the present results at 4000 Hz suggest that MOC efferent activation suppresses cochlear mechanical responses more at lower than at higher intensities across the range of intensities near threshold, while the results at 500 Hz suggest comparable mechanical suppression across the threshold intensity range. The results are discussed in the context of central masking and of auditory models of efferent suppression of cochlear mechanical responses.

Indexed as

absolute thresholdaudiometryauditory efferentsauditory modelsauditory suppressioncentral maskingtemporal integration

Identifiers

PMID25642172
PMCPMC4295548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.