Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25642156›Full record

ArticlePopulation, space and place2015

Exploring geographic variation in US mortality rates using a spatial Durbin approach.

Tse-Chuan Yang, Aggie Noah, Carla Shoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population, space and place, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ten-Year Outcomes of First-Episode Psychoses in the MRC ÆSOP-10 Study.The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tse-Chuan YangDepartment of Sociology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Tel:+1-814-777-6592, 351 Arts & Sciences Building, 1400 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Aggie NoahDepartment of Sociology, Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, 712 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Carla ShoffPopulation Research Institute, Social Science Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, 801 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI HARDY, MELISSA ANN · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
Training Program in Social Environments and Population HealthT32HD007514 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHN D. ICELAND · 1999 to 2026
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies focused on identifying the determinants of mortality in US counties have examined the relationships between mortality and explanatory covariates within a county only, and have ignored the well-documented spatial dependence of mortality. We challenge earlier literature by arguing that the mortality rate of a certain county may also be associated with the features of its neighboring counties beyond its own features. Drawing from both the spillover (i.e., same direction effect) and social relativity (i.e., opposite direction effect) perspectives, our spatial Durbin modeling results indicate that both theoretical perspectives provide valuable frameworks to guide the modeling of mortality variation in US counties. Our empirical findings support that mortality rate of a certain county is associated with the features of its neighbors beyond its own features. Specifically, we found support for the spillover perspective in which the percentage of the Hispanic population, concentrated disadvantage, and the social capital of a specific county are negatively associated with the mortality rate in the specific county and also in neighboring counties. On the other hand, the following covariates fit the social relativity process: health insurance coverage, percentage of non-Hispanic other races, and income inequality. Their direction of the associations with mortality in the specific county is opposite to that of the relationships with mortality in neighboring counties. Methodologically, spatial Durbin modeling addresses the shortcomings of traditional analytic approaches used in ecological mortality research such as ordinary least squares, spatial error, and spatial lag regression. Our results produce new insights drawn from unbiased estimates.

Indexed as

income inequalitymortalitysocial capitalsocial relativityspatial Durbin modelingspatial spillover

Identifiers

PMID25642156
PMCPMC4310504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.