Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25641763›Full record

ArticleCancer2015

A phase 1 study of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

John F Deeken, Hongkun Wang, Deepa Subramaniam, Aiwu Ruth He, Jimmy Hwang, John L Marshall, Christina E Urso, Yiru Wang, Corinne Ramos, Kenneth Steadman and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Towards precision oncology with patient-derived xenografts.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Back from the Brink: EGFR Inhibition in Gastroesophageal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence, prognosis and predictive status of HER2 amplification in anti-EGFR-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John F DeekenInova Comprehensive Cancer and Research Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.
Hongkun Wang
Deepa Subramaniam
Aiwu Ruth He
Jimmy Hwang
John L Marshall
Christina E Urso
Yiru Wang
Corinne Ramos
Kenneth Steadman
Michael J Pishvaian
Georgetown University Medical Center · USCarolinas Healthcare System · USGeorgetown University · USInova Health System · USMolecular Theranostics (United States) · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquired resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy may be caused by EGFR-v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ErbB2) heterodimerization and pathway reactivation. In preclinical studies, inhibiting ErbB2 blocked this resistance mechanism and resensitized cells to anti-EGFR therapy. Cetuximab targets EGFR, whereas lapatinib inhibits both EGFR and ErbB2. The objective of this phase 1 trial was to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with solid tumors.

methodsPatients received standard weekly cetuximab with escalating lapatinib doses of 750 mg, 1000 mg, or 1250 mg daily in 3-week cycles. DLTs were monitored through the end of cycle 2. Pretreatment and post-treatment tumor biopsies and germline DNA samples were obtained for correlative studies.

resultsTwenty-two patients were enrolled, and 18 patients each were evaluable for toxicity and response. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior anti-EGFR therapy. Common toxicities included rash and diarrhea. No patient experienced a DLT at the highest dose level, and no grade 4 toxicity was observed. Response included no complete responses, 3 partial responses, 9 patients with stable disease, and 6 patients with disease progression, for an overall response rate of 17% and a clinical benefit rate of 67%. The clinical benefit rate in patients who had previously received anti-EGFR therapy was 70%. The mean treatment duration was 4.7 cycles (range, 1-14 cycles). Decreased expression of EGFR/ErbB2 pathway components after treatment was correlated with response, whereas increased expression in the PI3K, Jak/Stat, and MAPK pathways occurred in nonresponders.

conclusionsThe combination of cetuximab and lapatinib was well tolerated, had the expected toxicities, and exhibited notable clinical activity, including in patients who had received previous anti-EGFR therapy. Further clinical study of this combination is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAnus NeoplasmsBiopsyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDiarrheaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug EruptionsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCetuximabEGFR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsLapatinibQuinazolinescetuximabclinical trialepidermal growth factor receptorlapatinibphase 1solid tumorsv-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2

Identifiers

PMID25641763
PMCPMC4424139
OpenAlexW1607392449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.