ArticleCancer2015
A phase 1 study of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.
Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- Cetuximab-conjugated sodium selenite nanoparticles for doxorubicin targeted delivery against MCF-7 breast cancer cells.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Towards precision oncology with patient-derived xenografts.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Small molecule profiling to define synergistic EGFR inhibitor combinations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Head & neck · 2022Article
- Pharmacogenomics Testing in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials: Constructive Criticism Is Warranted.Cancers · 2022Review
- Identification of Synergistic Drug Combinations to Target KRAS-Driven Chemoradioresistant Cancers Utilizing Tumoroid Models of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Recurrent Glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Synthetic Lethality Screening Highlights Colorectal Cancer Vulnerability to Concomitant Blockade of NEDD8 and EGFR Pathways.Cancers · 2021Article
- Beyond RAS and BRAF: HER2, a New Actionable Oncotarget in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Back from the Brink: EGFR Inhibition in Gastroesophageal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Precision Medicine Approaches to Overcome Resistance to Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Response of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive colorectal cancer to lapatinib monotherapy: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Prevalence, prognosis and predictive status of HER2 amplification in anti-EGFR-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020Review
- A phase I study of HER1, HER2 dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib plus the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2019Article
- Sodium cantharidate targets STAT3 and abrogates EGFR inhibitor resistance in osteosarcoma.Aging · 2019Article
- Noninvasive Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer: Role in Diagnosis and Personalised Treatment Perspectives.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2018Review
- Overcoming intratumoural heterogeneity for reproducible molecular risk stratification: a case study in advanced kidney cancer.BMC medicine · 2017Article
- Prolonged Response to HER2-Directed Therapy in a Patient With HER2-Amplified, Rapidly Progressive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2017Article
- HER2 genomic amplification in circulating tumor DNA from patients with cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcquired resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy may be caused by EGFR-v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ErbB2) heterodimerization and pathway reactivation. In preclinical studies, inhibiting ErbB2 blocked this resistance mechanism and resensitized cells to anti-EGFR therapy. Cetuximab targets EGFR, whereas lapatinib inhibits both EGFR and ErbB2. The objective of this phase 1 trial was to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with solid tumors.
methodsPatients received standard weekly cetuximab with escalating lapatinib doses of 750 mg, 1000 mg, or 1250 mg daily in 3-week cycles. DLTs were monitored through the end of cycle 2. Pretreatment and post-treatment tumor biopsies and germline DNA samples were obtained for correlative studies.
resultsTwenty-two patients were enrolled, and 18 patients each were evaluable for toxicity and response. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior anti-EGFR therapy. Common toxicities included rash and diarrhea. No patient experienced a DLT at the highest dose level, and no grade 4 toxicity was observed. Response included no complete responses, 3 partial responses, 9 patients with stable disease, and 6 patients with disease progression, for an overall response rate of 17% and a clinical benefit rate of 67%. The clinical benefit rate in patients who had previously received anti-EGFR therapy was 70%. The mean treatment duration was 4.7 cycles (range, 1-14 cycles). Decreased expression of EGFR/ErbB2 pathway components after treatment was correlated with response, whereas increased expression in the PI3K, Jak/Stat, and MAPK pathways occurred in nonresponders.
conclusionsThe combination of cetuximab and lapatinib was well tolerated, had the expected toxicities, and exhibited notable clinical activity, including in patients who had received previous anti-EGFR therapy. Further clinical study of this combination is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.