Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25641647›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2015

Thermogelling bioadhesive scaffolds for intervertebral disk tissue engineering: preliminary in vitro comparison of aldehyde-based versus alginate microparticle-mediated adhesion.

C Wiltsey, T Christiani, J Williams, J Scaramazza, C Van Sciver, K Toomer, J Sheehan, A Branda, A Nitzl, E England and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cohesion mechanisms for bioadhesives.Bioactive materials · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adhesive Tissue Engineered Scaffolds: Mechanisms and Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C WiltseyRowan University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
T ChristianiRowan University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
J WilliamsRowan University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
J ScaramazzaRowan University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
C Van SciverRowan University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
K ToomerMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology, 171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
J SheehanRowan University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, 42 East Laurel Rd, Stratford, NJ 08084, USA.
A BrandaSaint Joseph College School of Pharmacy, 229 Trumbull St., Hartford, CT 06103, USA.
A NitzlRowan University, Department of Biological Sciences, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
E EnglandRowan University, Department of Biological Sciences, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
J KadlowecRowan University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
C IftodeRowan University, Department of Biological Sciences, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
J VernengoRowan University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. Electronic address: vernengo@rowan.edu.
Rowan University · USHartford Financial Services (United States)Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Self-assembling Biomimetic Hydrogels with Bioadhesive Properties for IntervertebrR15AR063920 · NIAMS · ROWAN UNIVERSITY · PI VERNENGO, ANDREA JENNIFER · 2013 to 2013
$316k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R15 AR 063920-01NIAMS NIH HHS R15 AR063920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering of certain load-bearing parts of the body can be dependent on scaffold adhesion or integration with the surrounding tissue to prevent dislocation. One such area is the regeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD). In this work, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) was grafted with chondroitin sulfate (CS) (PNIPAAm-g-CS) and blended with aldehyde-modified CS to generate an injectable polymer that can form covalent bonds with tissue upon contact. However, the presence of the reactive aldehyde groups can compromise the viability of encapsulated cells. Thus, liposomes were encapsulated in the blend, designed to deliver the ECM derivative, gelatin, after the polymer has adhered to tissue and reached physiological temperature. This work is based on the hypothesis that the discharge of gelatin will enhance the biocompatibility of the material by covalently reacting with, or "end-capping", the aldehyde functionalities within the gel that did not participate in bonding with tissue upon contact. As a comparison, formulations were also created without CS aldehyde and with an alternative adhesion mediator, mucoadhesive calcium alginate particles. Gels formed from blends of PNIPAAm-g-CS and CS aldehyde exhibited increased adhesive strength compared to PNIPAAm-g-CS alone (p<0.05). However, the addition of gelatin-loaded liposomes to the blend significantly decreased the adhesive strength (p<0.05). The encapsulation of alginate microparticles within PNIPAAm-g-CS gels caused the tensile strength to increase twofold over that of PNIPAAm-g-CS blends with CS aldehyde (p<0.05). Cytocompatibility studies indicate that formulations containing alginate particles exhibit reduced cytotoxicity over those containing CS aldehyde. Overall, the results indicated that the adhesives composed of alginate microparticles encapsulated in PNIPAAm-g-CS have the potential to serve as a scaffold for IVD regeneration.

Indexed as

TemperatureAcrylic ResinsAdhesivenessAldehydesAlginatesBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell SurvivalFluorescenceGlucuronic AcidHEK293 CellsHexuronic AcidsHumansHydrogelsIntervertebral DiscLiposomesAcrylic ResinsAldehydesAlginatesBiocompatible MaterialsGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHydrogelsLiposomespoly-N-isopropylacrylamideBioadhesiveCopolymerHydrogelScaffoldTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID25641647
PMCPMC4351117
OpenAlexW1990715017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.