Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25641358›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2015

Socioemotional processing of morally-laden behavior and their consequences on others in forensic psychopaths.

Jean Decety, Chenyi Chen, Carla L Harenski, Kent A Kiehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean DecetyDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 5848 S., University Avenue, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 5848 S., University Avenue, Chicago, Illinois.
Chenyi Chen
Carla L Harenski
Kent A Kiehl

Funding

Neurological mechanisms in Emotional Processes of PsychopathyR01MH087525 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DECETY, JEAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
ERP and fMRI of emotion and cognition in psychopathyR01MH070539 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2005 to 2008
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070539NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large body of evidence supports the view that psychopathy is associated with anomalous emotional processing, reduced guilt and empathy, which are important risk factors for criminal behaviors. However, the precise nature and specificity of this atypical emotional processing is not well understood, including its relation to moral judgment. To further our understanding of the pattern of neural response to perceiving and evaluating morally-laden behavior, this study included 155 criminal male offenders with various level of psychopathy, as assessed with the Psychopathy Check List-Revised. Participants were scanned while viewing short clips depicting interactions between two individuals resulting in either interpersonal harm or interpersonal assistance. After viewing each clip, they were asked to identify the emotions of the protagonists. Inmates with high levels of psychopathy were more accurate than controls in successfully identifying the emotion of the recipient of both helpful and harmful actions. Significant hemodynamic differences were detected in the posterior superior temporal sulcus, amygdala, insula, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex when individuals with high psychopathy viewed negative versus positive scenarios moral scenarios and when they evaluated the emotional responses of the protagonists. These findings suggest that socioemotional processing abnormalities in psychopathy may be somewhat more complicated than merely a general or specific emotional deficit. Rather, situation-specific evaluations of the mental states of others, in conjunction with sensitivity to the nature of the other (victim vs. perpetrator), modulate attention to emotion-related cues. Such atypical processing likely impacts moral decision-making and behavior in psychopaths.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsMoralsSocial PerceptionAdultAntisocial Personality DisorderBrainBrain MappingCriminalsEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPsychiatric Status Rating Scalesdecision-makingemotionempathyinsulamoral evaluationpsychopathytemporoparietal junctionventral striatumventromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID25641358
PMCPMC6869618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.