Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25641260›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2015

New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3).

G B Bolli, M C Riddle, R M Bergenstal, M Ziemen, K Sestakauskas, H Goyeau, P D Home, on behalf of the EDITION 3 study investigators

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01676220 phase3completednot on this map

6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Insulin Glargine and Lantus® in Insulin-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Adequately Controlled With Non-Insulin Antihyperglycemic Drugs With a 6-month Safety Extension Period

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2012 to 2014Enrolled878ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsHOE901-U300 (new formulation of insulin glargine), Lantus (insulin glargine)
NCT03455985 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Diabetes Focused Discharge Order Set Among Poorly Controlled Hospitalized Patients Transitioning to Glargine U300 Insulin

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled158ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Patient Discharge, Blood Glucose, Low, Blood Glucose, HighArmsDischarge Order Set (DOS), Enhanced Standard Care (ESC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G B BolliDepartment of Medicine, Perugia University Medical School, Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy.
M C Riddle
R M Bergenstal
M Ziemen
K Sestakauskas
H Goyeau
P D Home
on behalf of the EDITION 3 study investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with that of glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes using oral glucose-lowering drugs.

methodsThe EDITION 3 study was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study. Participants were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 once daily for 6 months, discontinuing sulphonylureas and glinides, with a dose titration aimed at achieving pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentrations of 4.4-5.6 mmol/l (80-100 mg/dl). The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to month 6. The main secondary endpoint was percentage of participants with ≥1 nocturnal confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemia from week 9 to month 6. Other measures of glycaemia and hypoglycaemia, weight change and insulin dose were assessed.

resultsRandomized participants (n = 878) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 57.7 (10.1) years, diabetes duration 9.8 (6.4) years, body mass index 33.0 (6.7) kg/m(2) and HbA1c 8.54 (1.06) % [69.8 (11.6) mmol/mol]. HbA1c levels decreased by equivalent amounts with the two treatments; the least squares mean difference in change from baseline was 0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.17] % or 0.4 (-1.0 to 1.9) mmol/mol. Numerically fewer participants reported ≥1 nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemia from week 9 to month 6 [relative risk (RR) 0.89 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.20)] with Gla-300 versus Gla-100; a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia with this definition was found over the 6-month treatment period [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.99)]. No between-treatment differences in adverse events were identified.

conclusionsGla-300 is as effective as Gla-100 in reducing HbA1c in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes, with lower hypoglycaemia risk.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedBlood GlucoseDelayed-Action PreparationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug MonitoringDrug ResistanceEuropeFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInjections, SubcutaneousInsulin GlargineBlood GlucoseDelayed-Action PreparationsGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Glarginebasal insulin analoguesbasal insulin initiationtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID25641260
PMCPMC4409854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.