Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25640829›Full record

ArticleDevelopment and psychopathology2015

A differential susceptibility analysis reveals the "who and how" about adolescents' responses to preventive interventions: tests of first- and second-generation Gene × Intervention hypotheses.

Gene H Brody, Tianyi Yu, Steven R H Beach

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Development and psychopathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuroplasticity of selective attention: Research foundations and preliminary evidence for a gene by intervention interaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Genetic moderation of transactional relations between parenting practices and child self-regulation.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. An Adolescent Substance Prevention Model Blocks the Effect of CHRNA5 Genotype on Smoking During High School.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  14. Current Rural Drug Use in the US Midwest.Journal of drug abuse · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gene H BrodyUniversity of Georgia.
Tianyi YuUniversity of Georgia.
Steven R H BeachUniversity of Georgia.

Funding

RURAL AFRICAN AMERICAN YOUNG ADULTS' PATHWAYS TO PSYCHOSOCIAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTHR01HD030588 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI EHRLICH, KATHERINE BABCOCK · 1993 to 2023
$12.0M
Vulnerability to Drug Use & HIV: Advancing Prevention for Rural African AmericansP30DA027827 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BRODY, GENE H. · 2009 to 2018
$10.2M
Preventing Drug Use in Rural African AmericanR01DA019230 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI BRODY, GENE H. · 2004 to 2008
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD030588NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA027827NIDA NIH HHS P30DA027827NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate a genetic moderation effect of dopamine receptor 4 gene (DRD4) alleles that have seven or more repeats (long alleles) on an intervention to deter drug use among rural African American adolescents in high-risk families. Adolescents (N = 291, M age = 17) were assigned randomly to the Adults in the Making (AIM) program or to a control condition and were followed for 27.5 months. Adolescents provided data on drug use and vulnerability cognitions three times after pretest. Pretest assessments of caregiver depressive symptoms, disruption in the home, and support toward the adolescent were used to construct a family risk index. Adolescents living in high-risk families who carried at least one DRD4 long allele and were assigned to the control condition evinced greater escalations in drug use than did (a) adolescents who lived in high-risk families, carried the DRD4 long allele, and were assigned to AIM, or (b) adolescents assigned to either condition who carried no DRD4 long alleles. AIM-induced reductions in vulnerability cognitions were responsible for the Family Risk × AIM × DRD4 status drug use prevention effects. These findings support differential susceptibility predictions and imply that prevention effects on genetically susceptible individuals may be underestimated.

Indexed as

AllelesGenotypeAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanDNA Repeat ExpansionFemaleGene-Environment InteractionGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleRandom AllocationReceptors, Dopamine D4Rural PopulationSubstance-Related DisordersDRD4 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D4

Identifiers

PMID25640829
PMCPMC4324558
OpenAlexW2101013632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.