Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25640764›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied behavior analysis2015

The effects of fixed versus escalating reinforcement schedules on smoking abstinence.

Paul Romanowich, R J Lamb

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04927143 (Encouraging Abstinence Behavior in a Drug Epidemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04927143 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Encouraging Abstinence Behavior in a Drug Epidemic: Optimizing Dynamic Incentives

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2021 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsOpioid-use Disorder, Cocaine Use Disorder, Opioid Use, Cocaine UseArmsApp-Based Contingency Management, Sham Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Financial Incentives for Smoking Abstinence in Homeless Smokers: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Pilot Study of Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Initiating Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop System While Receiving a Behavioral Economics Intervention.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Examining implementation of contingency management in real-world settings.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Further psychometric analysis of the 20-item Partner Interaction Questionnaire in an adult sample of smokers.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul RomanowichUniversity of Texas at San Antonio.
R J Lamb
The University of Texas at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

INCREASING CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT SUCCESS USING SHAPINGR01DA013304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LAMB, RICHARD J · 1999 to 2009
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS DA013304NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies indicate that when abstinence is initiated, escalating reinforcement schedules maintain continuous abstinence longer than fixed reinforcement schedules. However, these studies were conducted for shorter durations than most clinical trials and also resulted in larger reinforcer value for escalating participants during the 1st week of the experiment. We tested whether escalating reinforcement schedules maintained abstinence longer than fixed reinforcement schedules in a 12-week clinical trial. Smokers (146) were randomized to an escalating reinforcement schedule, a fixed reinforcement schedule, or a control condition. Escalating reinforcement participants received $5.00 for their first breath carbon monoxide (CO) sample <3 ppm, with a $0.50 increase for each consecutive sample. Fixed reinforcement participants received $19.75 for each breath CO sample <3 ppm. Control participants received payments only for delivering a breath CO sample. Similar proportions of escalating and fixed reinforcement participants met the breath CO criterion at least once. Escalating reinforcement participants maintained criterion breath CO levels longer than fixed reinforcement and control participants. Similar to previous short-term studies, escalating reinforcement schedules maintained longer durations of abstinence than fixed reinforcement schedules during a clinical trial.

Indexed as

MotivationReinforcement ScheduleAdultBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationStatistics, NonparametricCarbon Monoxidecontingency managementdifferential reinforcementnicotineschedule of reinforcementsmoking cessationtobacco

Identifiers

PMID25640764
PMCPMC4480608
OpenAlexW2159411222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.