Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25640679›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2015

Next-generation sequencing of duplication CNVs reveals that most are tandem and some create fusion genes at breakpoints.

Scott Newman, Karen E Hermetz, Brooke Weckselblatt, M Katharine Rudd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Copy Number Variant Duplications Associated with Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Identification and Characterization of a Rare Exon 22 Duplication inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genetic andFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen): Advancing genomic knowledge through global curation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott NewmanDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Karen E HermetzDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Brooke WeckselblattDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
M Katharine RuddDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: katie.rudd@emory.edu.

Funding

Mechanism of subtelomeric breaksR01MH092902 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RUDD, MARY KATHARINE · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH092902NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpreting the genomic and phenotypic consequences of copy-number variation (CNV) is essential to understanding the etiology of genetic disorders. Whereas deletion CNVs lead obviously to haploinsufficiency, duplications might cause disease through triplosensitivity, gene disruption, or gene fusion at breakpoints. The mutational spectrum of duplications has been studied at certain loci, and in some cases these copy-number gains are complex chromosome rearrangements involving triplications and/or inversions. However, the organization of clinically relevant duplications throughout the genome has yet to be investigated on a large scale. Here we fine-mapped 184 germline duplications (14.7 kb-25.3 Mb; median 532 kb) ascertained from individuals referred for diagnostic cytogenetics testing. We performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to sequence 130 breakpoints from 112 subjects with 119 CNVs and found that most (83%) were tandem duplications in direct orientation. The remainder were triplications embedded within duplications (8.4%), adjacent duplications (4.2%), insertional translocations (2.5%), or other complex rearrangements (1.7%). Moreover, we predicted six in-frame fusion genes at sequenced duplication breakpoints; four gene fusions were formed by tandem duplications, one by two interconnected duplications, and one by duplication inserted at another locus. These unique fusion genes could be related to clinical phenotypes and warrant further study. Although most duplications are positioned head-to-tail adjacent to the original locus, those that are inverted, triplicated, or inserted can disrupt or fuse genes in a manner that might not be predicted by conventional copy-number assays. Therefore, interpreting the genetic consequences of duplication CNVs requires breakpoint-level analysis.

Indexed as

Base SequenceChromosome BreakpointsChromosome MappingComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsGene DuplicationGene FusionGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID25640679
PMCPMC4320257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.