ArticleScientific reports2015
SMK-17, a MEK1/2-specific inhibitor, selectively induces apoptosis in β-catenin-mutated tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective non-nuclear estrogen receptor activation with PaPE-1 evokes neuroprotection involving mTOR/MEK in an in vitro model of hypoxic/ischemic injury.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- Structures and functions of the MICOS: Pathogenesis and therapeutic implications in Alzheimer's disease.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- A chemical genomics-aggrephagy integrated method studying functional analysis of autophagy inducers.Autophagy · 2021Article
- Mitochondrial uncoupler exerts a synthetic lethal effect against β-catenin mutant tumor cells.Cancer science · 2017Article
- Metacycloprodigiosin induced cell death selectively in β-catenin-mutated tumor cells.The Journal of antibiotics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although clinical studies have evaluated several MEK1/2 inhibitors, it is unlikely that MEK1/2 inhibitors will be studied clinically. BRAF mutations have been proposed as a responder marker of MEK1/2 inhibitors in a preclinical study. However, current clinical approaches focusing on BRAF mutations have shown only moderate sensitivity of MEK1/2 inhibitors. This has led to insufficient support for their promoted clinical adoption. Further characterization of tumors sensitive to MEK inhibitors holds great promise for optimizing drug therapy for patients with these tumors. Here, we report that β-catenin mutations accelerate apoptosis induced by MEK1/2 inhibitor. SMK-17, a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor, induced apoptosis in tumor cell lines harboring β-catenin mutations at its effective concentration. To confirm that β-catenin mutations and mutant β-catenin-mediated TCF7L2 (also known as TCF4) transcriptional activity is a predictive marker of MEK inhibitors, we evaluated the effects of dominant-negative TCF7L2 and of active, mutated β-catenin on apoptosis induced by MEK inhibitor. Indeed, dominant-negative TCF7L2 reduced apoptosis induced by MEK inhibitor, whereas active, mutated β-catenin accelerated it. Our findings show that β-catenin mutations are an important responder biomarker for MEK1/2 inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.