ArticleMethods in cell biology2015
Practical aspects of the cellular force inference toolkit (CellFIT).
Article in Methods in cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apico-basal intercalations enable the integrity of curved epithelia.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Peeking into the future: inferring mechanics in dynamical tissues.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
- A Perspective on Developing Modeling and Image Analysis Tools to Investigate Mechanosensing Proteins.Integrative and comparative biology · 2023Article
- Measuring mechanical stress in living tissues.Nature reviews. Physics · 2020Article
- Tools to reverse-engineer multicellular systems: case studies using the fruit fly.Journal of biological engineering · 2019Review
- The role of traction in membrane curvature generation.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018Article
- In Vitro Modeling of Mechanics in Cancer Metastasis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2018Review
- A scheme for 3-dimensional morphological reconstruction and force inference in the early C. elegans embryo.PloS one · 2018Article
- Quantifying forces in cell biology.Nature cell biology · 2017Review
- Inferring cellular forces from image stacks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
If we are to fully understand the reasons that cells and tissues move and acquire their distinctive geometries during processes such as embryogenesis and wound healing, we will need detailed maps of the forces involved. One of the best current prospects for obtaining this information is noninvasive force-from-images techniques such as CellFIT, the Cellular Force Inference Toolkit, whose various steps are discussed here. Like other current quasistatic approaches, this one assumes that cell shapes are produced by interactions between interfacial tensions and intracellular pressures. CellFIT, however, allows cells to have curvilinear boundaries, which can significantly improve inference accuracy and reduce noise sensitivity. The quality of a CellFIT analysis depends on how accurately the junction angles and edge curvatures are measured, and a software tool we describe facilitates determination and evaluation of this information. Special attention is required when edges are crenulated or significantly different in shape from a circular arc. Because the tension and pressure equations are overdetermined, a select number of edges can be removed from the analysis, and these might include edges that are poorly defined in the source image, too short to provide accurate angles or curvatures, or noncircular. The approach works well for aggregates with as many as 1000 cells, and introduced errors have significant effects on only a few adjacent cells. An understanding of these considerations will help CellFIT users to get the most out of this promising new technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.