Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25640437›Full record

ArticleMethods in cell biology2015

Practical aspects of the cellular force inference toolkit (CellFIT).

Jim H Veldhuis, David Mashburn, M Shane Hutson, G Wayne Brodland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Apico-basal intercalations enable the integrity of curved epithelia.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Measuring mechanical stress in living tissues.Nature reviews. Physics · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The role of traction in membrane curvature generation.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018
    Article
  7. In Vitro Modeling of Mechanics in Cancer Metastasis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying forces in cell biology.Nature cell biology · 2017
    Review
  10. Inferring cellular forces from image stacks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jim H VeldhuisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
David MashburnDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
M Shane HutsonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystem Research & Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
G Wayne BrodlandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Funding

Cellular Biomechanics of Heat-Shock Induced Defects in Drosophila EmbryogenesisR01GM099107 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BRODLAND, GERALD WAYNE, HUTSON, M. SHANE · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01-GM099107NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If we are to fully understand the reasons that cells and tissues move and acquire their distinctive geometries during processes such as embryogenesis and wound healing, we will need detailed maps of the forces involved. One of the best current prospects for obtaining this information is noninvasive force-from-images techniques such as CellFIT, the Cellular Force Inference Toolkit, whose various steps are discussed here. Like other current quasistatic approaches, this one assumes that cell shapes are produced by interactions between interfacial tensions and intracellular pressures. CellFIT, however, allows cells to have curvilinear boundaries, which can significantly improve inference accuracy and reduce noise sensitivity. The quality of a CellFIT analysis depends on how accurately the junction angles and edge curvatures are measured, and a software tool we describe facilitates determination and evaluation of this information. Special attention is required when edges are crenulated or significantly different in shape from a circular arc. Because the tension and pressure equations are overdetermined, a select number of edges can be removed from the analysis, and these might include edges that are poorly defined in the source image, too short to provide accurate angles or curvatures, or noncircular. The approach works well for aggregates with as many as 1000 cells, and introduced errors have significant effects on only a few adjacent cells. An understanding of these considerations will help CellFIT users to get the most out of this promising new technique.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysicsDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianUser-Computer InterfaceCellFITCell mechanicsCell shapeForce-from-shape methodsForce inference techniquesInterfacial tensionsIntracellular pressuresMorphogenetic forces

Identifiers

PMID25640437
PMCPMC4750379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.