Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2015
First-Episode Services for Psychotic Disorders in the U.S. Public Sector: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Usual Care Versus Specialized, Phase-specific Care in the Public Sector for First Episode Psychosis.
Adapting and Improving Transition Care for First Episode Psychosis
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of the Impact of Admission to a Psychiatric Hospital on Quality of Life in Patients With a First Episode Psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Early interventions for first onset of symptoms of mental health conditions: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Duration of Untreated Psychosis and Outcomes in First-Episode Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Early Detection and Intervention Strategies.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Pooled it
- Economic Evaluation of Early Psychosis Interventions From A Canadian Perspective.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2022Pooled it
- Humour-based interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.JAMA psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- Analysis of Early Intervention Services on Adult Judicial Outcomes.JAMA psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Predictors of Hospitalization of Individuals With First-Episode Psychosis: Data From a 2-Year Follow-Up of the RAISE-ETP.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Trial
- An Economic Evaluation of Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Services for First-Episode Psychosis in the U.S. Public Sector.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2018Trial
- Psychopharmacological Treatment in the RAISE-ETP Study: Outcomes of a Manual and Computer Decision Support System Based Intervention.The American journal of psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive, Integrated Care for First Episode Psychosis in the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2016Trial
- Comprehensive Versus Usual Community Care for First-Episode Psychosis: 2-Year Outcomes From the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program.The American journal of psychiatry · 2016Trial
- The Early Psychosis Intervention Center (EPICENTER): development and six-month outcomes of an American first-episode psychosis clinical service.BMC psychiatry · 2015Trial
- Psychiatric Hospitalization After Enrollment in Coordinated Specialty Care: Unexpected Gender- and Age-Related Disparities.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Enhancing Coordinated Specialty Care Through Early Detection: Impact of Reduced Duration of Untreated Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Three-year outcome comparison between extended early intervention and standard psychiatric care for adults with first-episode psychosis in Hong Kong.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Functional Coupling and Longitudinal Outcome Prediction in First-Episode Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- Predictors of Service Engagement and Disengagement in Community-Based Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis in Texas.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study sought to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive first-episode service, the clinic for Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP), in an urban U.S. community mental health center by comparing it with usual treatment.
methodsThis pragmatic randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with first-episode psychosis within five years of illness onset and 12 weeks of antipsychotic exposure. Referrals were mostly from inpatient psychiatric units, and enrollees were randomly allocated to STEP or usual treatment. Main outcomes included hospital utilization (primary); the ability to work or attend age-appropriate schooling-or to actively seek these opportunities (vocational engagement); and general functioning. Analysis was by modified intent to treat (excluding only three who withdrew consent) for hospitalization; for other outcomes, only data for completers were analyzed.
resultsAfter one year, STEP participants had less inpatient utilization compared with those in usual treatment: no psychiatric hospitalizations, 77% versus 56% (risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-1.58); mean hospitalizations, .33±.70 versus .68±.92 (p=.02); and mean bed-days, 5.34±13.53 versus 11.51±15.04 (p=.05). For every five patients allocated to STEP versus usual treatment, one additional patient avoided hospitalization over the first year (number needed to treat=5; CI=2.7-26.5). STEP participants also demonstrated better vocational engagement (91.7% versus 66.7%; RR=1.40, CI=1.18-1.48) and showed salutary trends in global functioning measures.
conclusionsThis trial demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a U.S. public-sector model of early intervention for psychotic illnesses. Such services can also support translational research and are a relevant model for other serious mental illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.