Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25639913›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2015

Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.

Kristine Hopkins, Kari White, Fran Linkin, Celia Hubert, Daniel Grossman, Joseph E Potter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Minors' Experiences Accessing Confidential Contraception in Texas.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristine HopkinsPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin. khopkins@prc.utexas.edu.
Kari WhiteDepartment of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Fran LinkinTexas Policy Evaluation Project, University of Texas at Austin.
Celia HubertPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.
Daniel GrossmanIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland.
Joseph E PotterPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.
The University of Texas at Austin · USIbis Reproductive Health · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI UMBERSON, DEBRA J. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
NICHD NIH HHS 5R24HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextLittle is known about low-income women's and teenagers' experiences accessing publicly funded family planning services, particularly after policy changes are made that affect the cost of and access to such services.

methodsEleven focus groups were conducted with 92 adult women and 15 teenagers in nine Texas metropolitan areas in July-October 2012, a year after legislation that reduced access to subsidized family planning was enacted. Participants were recruited through organizations that serve low-income populations. At least two researchers independently coded the transcripts of the discussions and identified main themes.

resultsAlthough most women were not aware of the legislative changes, they reported that in the past year, they had had to pay more for previously free or low-cost services, use less effective contraceptive methods or forgo care. They also indicated that accessing affordable family planning services had long been difficult, that applying and qualifying for programs was a challenge and that obtaining family planning care was harder than obtaining pregnancy-related care. As a result of an inadequate reproductive health safety net, women experienced unplanned pregnancies and were unable to access screening services and follow-up care. Teenagers experienced an additional barrier, the need to obtain parental consent. Some women preferred to receive family planning services from specialized providers, while others preferred more comprehensive care.

conclusionWomen in Texas have long faced challenges in obtaining subsidized family planning services. Legislation that reduced access to family planning services for low-income women and teenagers appears to have added to those challenges.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFinancing, GovernmentHealth Care ReformHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsTexasWomen's Health ServicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25639913
PMCPMC4478214
OpenAlexW2002223048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.