Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25639752›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2015

Optimization of the antimicrobial effect of blue light on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro.

Violet V Bumah, Daniela S Masson-Meyers, Susan Cashin, Chukuka S Enwemeka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of pathogenic microbes: State of the art.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Violet V BumahCollege of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53211.
Daniela S Masson-Meyers
Susan Cashin
Chukuka S Enwemeka

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR031973 · NCRR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2010 to 2011
$7.9M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031973NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR031973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn previous studies, we showed that irradiation with 405 nm or 470 nm light suppresses up to 92% methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) growth in vitro and that the remaining bacteria re-colonize. In this study, the aim was to develop a protocol that yields 100% MRSA growth suppression. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe cultured 3 × 10(6) and 5 × 10(6) CFU/ml USA300 strain of MRSA and then irradiated each plate with varying fluences of 1-60 J/cm2 of 405 nm or 470 nm light, either once or twice at 6 hours intervals. Next, we plated 7 × 10(6) CFU/ml and irradiated it with 45, 50, 55, or 60 J/cm2 fluence, once, twice, or thrice at the same 6 hours intervals. In a third experiment, the same culture density was irradiated with 0, 165, 180, 220, or 240 J/cm(2) , either once, twice, or thrice.

resultsIrradiation with either wavelength significantly reduced the bacterial colonies regardless of bacterial density (P < 0.05). At 3 × 10(6) CFU/ml density, nearly 40% and 50% growth of MRSA were suppressed with as little as 3 J/cm2 of 405 nm and 470 nm wavelengths, respectively. Moreover, 100% of the colonies were suppressed with a single exposure to 55 or 60 J/cm2 of 470 nm light or double treatment with 50, 55, or 60 J/cm2 of 405 nm wavelength. At 5 × 10(6) CFU/ml density, irradiating twice with 50, 55, or 60 J/cm2 of either wavelength suppressed bacterial growth completely, lower fluences did not. The denser 7 × 10(6) CFU/ml culture required higher doses to achieve 100% suppression, either one shot with 220 J/cm2 of 470 nm light or two shots of the same dose using 405 nm.

conclusionThe bactericidal effect of blue light can be optimized to yield 100% bacterial growth suppression, but with relatively high fluences for dense bacterial cultures, such as 7 × 10(6) CFU/ml.

Indexed as

LightColony Count, MicrobialMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusantimicrobial blue lightbacteria suppressionmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusphototherapy

Identifiers

PMID25639752
PMCPMC4834034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.