Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25638752›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2015

A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Nolan A Wages, Craig L Slingluff, Gina R Petroni

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Statistical controversies in clinical research: early-phase adaptive design for combination immunotherapies.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Two-stage design for phase I-II cancer clinical trials using continuous dose combinations of cytotoxic agents.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nolan A WagesDivision of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. Electronic address: nwages@virginia.edu.
Craig L SlingluffDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4135, USA.
Gina R PetroniDivision of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Designs for phase I trials of combinations of agentsR01CA142859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CONAWAY, MARK R · 2010 to 2017
$2.1M
Phase I Designs for Combined Immunotherapies in CancerK25CA181638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI WAGES, NOLAN · 2014 to 2018
$780k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA142859NCI NIH HHS K25 CA181638NCI NIH HHS K25CA181638-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In oncology, vaccine-based immunotherapy often investigates regimens that demonstrate minimal toxicity overall and higher doses may not correlate with greater immune response. Rather than determining the maximum tolerated dose, the goal of the study becomes locating the optimal biological dose, which is defined as a safe dose demonstrating the greatest immunogenicity, based on some predefined measure of immune response. Incorporation of adjuvants, new or optimized peptide vaccines, and combining vaccines with immune modulators may enhance immune response, with the aim of improving clinical response. Innovative dose escalation strategies are needed to establish the safety and immunogenicity of new immunologic combinations. We describe the implementation of an adaptive design for identifying the optimal treatment strategy in a multi-site, FDA-approved, phase I/II trial of a novel vaccination approach using long-peptides plus TLR agonists for resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. Operating characteristics of the design are demonstrated under various possible true scenarios via simulation studies. Overall performance indicates that the design is a practical Phase I/II adaptive method for use with combined immunotherapy agents. The simulation results demonstrate the method's ability to effectively recommend optimal regimens in a high percentage of trials with manageable sample sizes. The numerical results presented in this work include the type of simulation information that aid review boards in understanding design performance, such as average sample size and frequency of early trial termination, which we hope will augment early-phase trial design in cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesChemotherapy, AdjuvantDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansImmunotherapyMaximum Tolerated DoseMelanomaNeoplasm StagingSkin NeoplasmsToll-Like ReceptorsAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesToll-Like ReceptorsBiological agentImmunotherapyOncologyOptimal dosePhase I/II

Identifiers

PMID25638752
PMCPMC4380742
OpenAlexW2058033125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.