Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25638694›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2015

History and present state of targeted intrathecal drug delivery.

Syed Rizvi, Krishna Kumar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733427 (A Pilot Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07733427 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinique BizetRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsPancreatic Cancer Pain, Intrathecal Analgesic, Intrathecal Administration of the Drug, Pancreatic CarcinomaArmsIntrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump, Administration of medication, including analgesics, via an intrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump or via periodic injections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeted Drug Delivery for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: Longitudinal Data From the Product Surveillance Registry.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Syed RizviDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7H SW8, Canada, rizvi20s@gmail.com.
Krishna Kumar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 50 years ago, the seminal experiments of Melzack and Wall, culminating in the gate control theory, coupled with the discovery of endogenous opioid receptors, helped shape modern understandings of pain and provided interventionalists a potent therapeutic gateway to neuraxial analgesia. This paper emphasizes the historical antecedents, present state, and emerging future of the neuromodulatory technique of targeted intrathecal drug delivery (TIDD) for chronic pain. The strengths of TIDD are its customizability, reversibility, programmability, and low risk profile. Its benefits are evidenced by improved pain relief and quality of life and reduced demand for health-care resources.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainDrug Delivery SystemsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInfusion Pumps, ImplantableInjections, SpinalIntractable PainNeoplasmsPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.