Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25638471›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2015

Effect of rearing environment on bone growth of pullets.

P Regmi, T S Deland, J P Steibel, C I Robison, R C Haut, M W Orth, D M Karcher

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Effects of Dust Bath Design on Hen Behavior in New Aviary Systems in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P RegmiDepartment of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
T S DelandOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan 48824.
J P SteibelDepartment of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
C I RobisonDepartment of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
R C HautOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan 48824.
M W OrthDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409.
D M KarcherDepartment of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 dkarcher@msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative housing systems for laying hens provide mechanical loading and help reduce bone loss. Moreover, achieving greater peak bone mass during pullet phase can be crucial to prevent fractures in the production period. The aim of this study was to determine the housing system effects on bone quality of pullets. Tibiae and humeri of White Leghorn pullets reared in conventional cages (CCs) and a cage-free aviary (AV) system were studied. At 16 wk, 120 birds at random from each housing system were euthanized. Right and left tibiae and humeri were collected and further analyzed. Cortical bone density and thickness were measured using computed tomography. Periosteal and endosteal dimensions were measured at the fracture site during mechanical testing. At 4, 8, 12, and 16 wk, serum concentrations of osteocalcin and hydroxylysyl pyridinoline were analyzed as markers of bone formation and resorption. Cortical bone density was higher (P<0.05) in humeri of AV pullets, and tibiae were denser (P<0.05) for AV pullets in the distal section of the bone compared to CC pullets. Ash content was higher (P<0.05) in AV humeri with no difference in tibiae ash content. Tibiae and humeri of AV pullets had a thicker cortex than the CC pullets (P<0.05). Additionally, the tibiae and humeri of AV pullets had greater (P<0.05) second moment of areas than the CC pullets. While some bone material properties between groups were different (P<0.05), the differences were so small (<7%) that they likely have no clinical significance. Serum osteocalcin concentrations were not different between the treatments, but hydroxylsyl pyridinoline concentrations were higher in CC pullets at 12 wk compared to the AV pullets and the effect reversed at 16 wk (P<0.05). These findings indicate that tibiae and humeri respond differently to load bearing activities during growth. The improved load bearing capability and stiffness in bones of AV pullets were related to increased cross-sectional geometry.

Indexed as

Bone DevelopmentAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimal WelfareChickensFemaleHousing, Animalaviarybonemechanicspulletsstructure

Identifiers

PMID25638471
PMCPMC4990893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.