Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015
Continuous, low-dose capecitabine for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.
Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metronomic capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first line induction with XELOX for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Medicine · 2020Trial
- Article
- Metronomic chemotherapy in cancer treatment: new wine in an old bottle.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Metronomic chemotherapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center retrospective analysis.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022Article
- Article
- Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience.Journal of oncology · 2019Review
- Clinical characteristics and treatment propensity in elderly patients aged over 80 years with colorectal cancer.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2018Article
- Current achievements and future perspectives of metronomic chemotherapy.Investigational new drugs · 2017Review
- HRG/HER2/HER3 signaling promotes AhR-mediated Memo-1 expression and migration in colorectal cancer.Oncogene · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose metronomic oral capecitabine in pretreated or frail patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Patients with recurrent colorectal cancer and prior treatment with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan or unable to receive standard chemotherapy because of toxicity concerns were included. Treatment consisted of oral capecitabine 1,500 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response rates were determined according to RECIST criteria. The end points were disease control rate [(DCR) consisting of complete response, partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD)], overall survival (OS), and safety. Sixty-eight patients, median age 72.5 years, were treated. The median number of previous treatments was 2 (range 0-5). Sixty-two percent of patients had received ≥2 previous lines of treatment. The overall DCR was 26%, PR in 2 (3%) and SD in 14 (23%). Nineteen percent of patients were progression free for at least 6 months. In an exploratory analysis, there was a significant relation of performance status with DCR (HR = 3.3; P = 0.05). The median OS was 8 months. DCR was associated with a longer survival (HR = 0.4; P < 0.01). Grade 3 toxicities included anemia (1), diarrhea (1), and hand-foot syndrome (1). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related deaths. Metronomic capecitabine was moderately active and well-tolerated in pretreated or frail patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.